Laserfiche WebLink
<br />toughest controversies for us to come to grips with. <br />Currently, we are hearing the controversy cast in very simplistic <br />terms. There is a dimension of truth to them, but it is not the whole <br />truth; therefore, we are misguided as to what the issue is all about. <br />The best example I can think of is that of the Spotted Owl in the <br />Pacific Northwest. This is an issue that my organization, the <br />Wilderness Society, has been very involved in. I used to be with U.S. <br />Fish & Wildlife Service, and I worked on the Spotted Owl issue when <br />I was with them. The media focused on the phrase "owls versus jobs." <br />The issue was reduced to either saving the Spotted Owls, or saving <br />timber jobs. However, the reality of the situation is not that <br />simple. <br />Pat mentioned that we have over two hundred different taxa of <br />salmon in the Pacific Northwest that are in the process of being <br />considered for listing as either threatened or endangered. These <br />salmon spawn in streams that are embedded in forests. Many of these <br />forests are public forests, administered by the BLM or Forest Service. <br />The population of these different stocks of salmon have been <br />drastically reduced in recent decades. There are a number of reasons <br />for this decline. It is not a simple situation. Some of it may come <br />down to harvest, particularly on the high seas where we cannot <br />regulate it. Certainly, some of it is tied up in the fact that the <br />Northwest is in the midst of a drought on the order of five or six <br />years with below normal rainfall. We also believe, and scientific <br />evidence indicates, that the rate at which we are cutting lumber in <br />the Pacific Northwest is also diminishing the utility of the streams <br />to be able to produce salmon. I want to emphasize that the problem <br />is not the fact that we are cutting lumber, but the rate at which we <br />are cutting it. One estimate was made that the salmon industry in the <br />Pacific Northwest, including both the commercial and the recreational <br />segments, employs 60,000 people, and is worth one billion dollars per <br />year. I do not know the accuracy of these figures, but I can assure <br />you that the salmon industry is a very vital component of the economy <br />in the Pacific Northwest. Many communities are dependent on fish, <br />just as other communities are dependent on timber. What I think we <br />need to understand, as a society, is that we are pushing resources to <br />such a limit that we are not just in a situation of whether it is owls <br />or jobs, but whether it is timber jobs or salmon jobs. Who are we <br />going to put out of work? Are we going to put the logger out of work, <br />or the fisherman? It does not reduce to conservationists wanting to <br />put people out of work, or stop development, rather it is a result of <br />the fact that we are utilizing resources in such a way that we are <br />creating friction and dysfunction in the natural world that is the <br />original source of all this wealth. <br />Recently, the term biodiversity has been used frequently, <br />particularly, in the context of the Earth Summit in Rio. The. <br />Endangered Species Act is an American original. We are the first <br />society in the recorded written history to proclaim that the variety <br />of natural living things is of fundamental importance to humanity and <br />should be protected. No other nation has ever done that. We took a <br />leadership role. I spent two years on loan from the u.S. Fish and <br />Wildlife Service to work for the Agency for International Development <br />to stimulate the development of conservation programs in our foreign <br />assistance programs. Congress was directing A. I . D. to pay more <br /> <br />80 <br />