Laserfiche WebLink
<br />in order to avoid severe sanctions and enforcement actions that result <br />from taking of endangered species. Cases out of our Klamath <br />Irrigation project on the border of Oregon and California, involving <br />a cousin of one of your favorites, the Colorado River sucker, <br />illustrates just how dramatic the burden to maintain the populations <br />of listed species can be. In that situation irrigation deliveries <br />were curtailed to conserve habitat of the lost river sucker. The <br />conservation responsibilities remain regardless of the seven year <br />drought situation and even at the expense of hundred-year-old water <br />rights. The Act does have those kinds of teeth. There is no doubt <br />about it. <br />Is the Endangered Species Act likely to go away? Well, anyone <br />can have fun predicting politics. I say, no. I was interested in <br />reading some of the materials from the National Water Association and <br />their wish list of changes for the Endangered Species Act. Of the ten <br />or so that I saw, I think they may have a chance for maybe two of <br />them. What the NWA is really addressing is the need to improve public <br />participation, economic analysis and the other processes involved. <br />Notions that Section 7 is going to be repealed are natural. However, <br />the demographics of the United States strongly supports preservation <br />at almost any cost. When you look at the urban-rural dynamics, you <br />can see why. The people who are sending the most people to Congress <br />can afford, in many instances, to preserve the rare endangered species <br />of the Colorado River and the Pacific Northwest. The balance of power <br />is decidedly in favor of retaining very strong protection. Is the act <br />untouchable? No, of course not. Will it be amended? Probably. will <br />it be gutted? Will it be turned into NEPA, a "disclose and destroy" <br />statute? No, it will not. <br />I do not think it is likely to go away. I think we are going to <br />have to learn to live with it. I am a corporate lawyer, believe it <br />or not. My clients pay me money in order to hear that. I tell them <br />that because it is true. They may not like me for saying it. They <br />may not like to hear it, but it is true. Folks, you are just going <br />to have to learn to live with it. Here are some thoughts on how to <br />live with it. <br /> <br />Attitude <br />The first ingredient for living with the Endangered Species Act <br />and figuring out how to allocate Colorado water is attitude. What do <br />I mean? Problem solving. Be willing to rethink old approaches, even <br />the great paradigm, use it or lose it. Be solution oriented. That <br />is why I emphasize the recovery process. That is where the solutions <br />come from. If you want to get the Endangered Species Act out of your <br />way, get the species off the list. It is just that simple -- at least <br />in concept. <br /> <br />Cooperation <br />Confrontation will always exist and nothing I say today will stop <br />it. Most people will love to go and fight as soon as they can. I am <br />just saying give peace a chance. Give the cooperative approach a <br />chance every once in awhile, just to sort of vary the menu. It is <br />happening more and more. I do not mean to be totally supercilious, <br />I know that it is happening. Do it more. <br /> <br />69 <br />