Laserfiche WebLink
<br />accessible, and are therefore not closely accountable. <br />Government entities--both state and local--should take greater <br />respons ibi li ty to make their processes access ible and accoun- <br />table. <br /> <br />One reason for the mystique is the fact that Colorado's <br /> <br /> <br />system is so decentral ized. As discussed earlier, Colorado's <br /> <br /> <br />unique and diverse issues are addressed through a seemingly <br /> <br /> <br />complex set of agencies. Those interested in water resource <br /> <br /> <br />development issues need to be aware of the "big picture" of how <br /> <br /> <br />water policy is developed and implemented in this state. <br /> <br />Another reason for the mystique is that many of the policies <br />and procedures of state and local entities are unwritten. One <br />explanation for this is a lack of funding. Many agencies are so <br />overburdened with the ongoing pressures of day-to-day business <br />that time and staff are simply not available to document much of <br />the background of how and why decisions are made and, more impor- <br />tantly, the policies that are common threads wi thin such deci- <br />sions. As a result, members of the general public without a <br />background in water policy issues are often frustrated when they <br />attempt to glean basic information. This leads to the perception <br />that policy is controlled by the "water buffalos". <br /> <br />One potent ial solut ion may be for agencies to produce pos i- <br /> <br /> <br />tion and discussion papers and policy statements. For example, <br /> <br /> <br />on a state level, the Department of Natural Resources can issue <br /> <br /> <br />position documents, which summarize ongoing poli.ci.es ,,(1<1 pas i- <br /> <br /> <br />tions of the Department and its Divisions. These documents can <br /> <br />-12- <br />