Laserfiche WebLink
<br />agencies (Federal Register 1984a, b; as cited by Schnick et al. 1986). <br /> <br />These laws (formally known as The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and <br />Rodenticide Act and Amendments; and The Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and <br />Amendments) stipulated that the use of drugs and chemicals in fish culture and <br />fisheries management is illegal unless they have been reqistered or approved by <br />the EPA or the FDA for that purpose. A reqi stered compound is a product whi ch <br />has an EPA or FDA 1 abe 1 speci fyi ng its all owed uses. An approved product does <br />not necessarily have an EPA or FDA label because some other classification may <br />allow its use in aquatic situations. Examples of approved products are acetic <br />acid, carbon dioxide and salt (Schnick et al. 1986). Many approved products are <br />also classified as "GRAS" (generally recognized as safe) by the FDA. <br /> <br />In order for a compound to become registered it must undergo very extensive <br />and costly testing. Required data includes: (1) efficacy, (2) toxicity to the <br />test animal and the environment, (3) residues, metabolites and assay methods <br />used, (4) residue persistence in test animal and water effluents, (5) residue <br />tolerance level (level permitted in food eaten by humans), and (6) withdrawal <br />time (period required between termination of treatment and marketing or release <br />as stocked fish). The registration of only one compound requires several years <br />of work and about $500,000 (R.A. Schnick, personal communication). The fishery <br />use, or potential fi shery use, of apart i cul ar drug or chemi ca 1 is often mi nor <br />compared to its use in non-fishery activity. If the market value is relatively <br />low, pri vate industry sponsors may not spend thei r money and time to obtain a <br />registered status for that compound. Because of these problems, the u.s. Fish <br />and Wildlife Services' (USFWS) National Fishery Research Laboratory in La Crosse, <br />Wisconsin, is very active in registration activities (Meyer et al. 1976; Schnick <br />et ar. 1979). <br /> <br />Both the EPA and FDA have recently increased their activity to enforce the <br />laws that regulate the use of drugs and chemicals in fish culture. Inspecting <br />agents have vi sited hatcheri es to quest ion personnel about the use of certa in <br />products. If the use is not covered with an approved label, or some other form <br />of approval, the user is subject to disciplinary action (Schnick et al. 1986; <br />R.A. Schnick, personal communication; D.E. Anderson, personal communication). <br /> <br />Another problem involves attempts by fish culturists to save costs by <br />purchasing unregistered forms of a drug or chemical. For example, one commonly <br />used parasiticide can be purchased for one-half to one-third the cost of the <br />registered form of the compound, but the unregistered form may contain impurities <br />and could cause toxicity problems. More importantly, the sponsor/supplier of the <br />approved product might not recover costs of registering the product. This could <br />cause the sponsor to remove the product from the market, resulting in the <br />unavailability of an effective legal compound. <br /> <br />On malachite qreen <br /> <br />On checking any current list (Tables 1 & 2) of registered or approved drugs <br />or chemicals used to treat fish diseases, you will note a very obvious omission. <br />Malachite green, the most effective fungicide known in fish culture, is not <br />1 i sted! Thi s compound has long been used as the treatment of choi ce for fungus <br />infections on fish eggs. It has also been used in combination with formalin for <br /> <br />... <br /> <br />18 <br />