Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />two high flow years (1993 and 1995) summer (post-runoff) densities were less than in the <br />spring, presumably because the runoff flooded preferred NNC habitats (backwaters) which <br />reduced habitat availability during high flows. In the other three years (1992, 1994 and <br />1996) NNC density increased in the summer indicating peak flows of those years did not <br />negatively impact habitat availability and/or temperatures suitable for reproduction were <br />reached sooner. The reduced NNC density in 1993 and 1995 is therefore attributed to <br />runoff conditions. The high spring NNC density in 1995 after the low year of 1994 <br />indicates there can be a large range in variability between years. <br /> <br />Table 7. Average ofNNC densities (number/100m3 seined) from the <br />upper (near Moab) and lower (below Potash mine) stations on <br />Colorado River (Trammel and Chart 1999a). <br /> <br /> <br />MER <br />m3 <br />NNC <br />943 <br />1075 <br />1866 <br />4065 <br />3570 <br />2304 <br />1009 <br />2965 <br />3507 <br /> <br /> <br />Non Native Cyprinid-Backwater Density. Colorado (ISMP) <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />Backwaters in Colorado are sampled every year during the fall using the ISMP <br />methodology (McAda, 1998). ISMP Reach 2 is 30 miles of the Colorado River from the <br />confluence of the Colorado and Gunnison Rivers downstream to RM 139 (Mee Canyon). <br />The Reach 2 NNC backwater density was highly correlated with drift density measured at <br />Loma, Colorado (R2 == 0.776) (Table 8). The relationship between NNC drift abundance <br />and density in backwaters was positive with 1992 the highest and 1996 the lowest for both <br />larval drift and backwater abundance. <br /> <br />Fall NNC densities in backwaters in Reach 2 were higher in the two low flow years <br />than in the two high flow years, but the intermediate flow year (1996) had the lowest <br />density of the period. Fall NNC density in Reach 2 was not strongly correlated with <br />Reach 1, located between River Mile 0 to 110 (Table 8). The coefficient of determination <br />for NNC densities between Reach 1 and 2 was only 0.042. <br /> <br />17 <br />