Laserfiche WebLink
<br />16 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Table 6. Seasonal drift densities for Lorna, Westwater and Moab and coefficient of <br />determination (r) between the three sites, and summer, fall and spring <br />densities of Colorado pikeminnow YOY seined in backwaters and the r2 <br />between drift and backwater densities, and over-winter survival estimates <br />based on spring and fall densities. <br /> <br />YEAR DRIFT DRIFT DRIFT SUMMER FALL SPRING OVERWINTER <br /> LOMA WW MOAB Mean Mean Mean SURVIVAL <br /> #/1000m3 #/1000m3 #/1000m3 #/100m3 #/100m3 #/100m3 Percent <br />1992 6.6 1.1 8.8 17.9 14.2 4.7 33% <br />1993 3.6 2.5 11.5 3.2 8.6 0.87 10% <br />1994 3 0.53 1.08 3.8 1.1 2.5 214% <br />1995 12.9 1.46 41.7 0.07 1.0 0.10 9% <br />1996 2.4 1.64 22.6 78.0 37.6 No Data No Data <br />LOMA r2 - 0.0022 0.5712 0.2049 0.2285 <br />WWr2 - - 0.0815 0.0087 0.0559 <br />MOAB r2 - - - 0.0094 0.0022 <br />SUMM ~ - - - - 0.9521 <br /> <br />Drift densities at Loma and Moab, separated by over 100 miles, were more closely <br />correlated (R2 = 0.57) than Loma-Westwater or Westwater-Moab (Table 6). The strength <br />of the Loma/Moab relationship was due to the highest drift densities for both sites <br />occurring in 1995. 1995 was the highest flow year, which suggests that high flows may <br />stimulate increased spawning efforts and larval production in those reaches. Drift <br />densities were third highest in 1993 at both sites. The low flow years (1992 and 1994) <br />ranked fourth and fifth, respectively at Moab and second and fourth, respectively at Loma. <br />The lowest drift density at Loma and the second highest drift density at Moab occurred in <br />1996, the intermediate flow year. <br /> <br />Catch rates in fish/1000m3 were substantially higher at Moab than at Westwater <br />for all years, and higher than Loma in four of the five years. Total transport abundance <br />was higher at Moab than at Lorna or Westwater for all five years, which suggests some <br />spawning taking place below Westwater. <br /> <br />Non Native Cyprinid - Catch Characteristics and Backwater Density <br /> <br />A very strong relationship was found between spring runoff flows and density of <br />NNC for the four year period, 1992 to 1995. The two highest runoff years (1993 and <br />1995) had the lowest NNC densities in habitats sampled in the following summer, fall and <br />spring (pre-runoff) collections (Table 7). Mean NNC density was three times higher in <br />summer and fall samples in the two low runoff years (1992 and 1994) than the two high <br />years (1993 and 1995) (Table 7). The mean NNC density for the two low runoff years was <br />six times greater in the (spring) pre-runoff samples than the high year average. <br /> <br />Density estimates for NNC also varied seasonally. Non-native-cyprinid (NNC) <br />densities peaked in the fall indicating recruitment of young fish during the summer period. <br />Densities were reduced in the spring indicating over-winter mortality (Table 7). In the <br />