Laserfiche WebLink
<br />8 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />subtracting the average incubation time of fertilized eggs at 18C (6 d, Bestgen, 1997) from <br />the estimated hatch date. <br /> <br />Total fish used in the analysis are larvae and YOY (fry) combined. In most years <br />most fish collected were larvae, but in 1994 most net samples were comprised of a large <br />percentage YOY as classified by Snyder (1995). Lengths of Colorado pikeminnow <br />young-of-year and larvae were tested for differences between years using the t-test, and <br />mean size were correlated to spawning dates, degree days and flow. <br /> <br />Data from two concurrent studies in Utah were compared to results of this study <br />to determine the influence of Colorado pikeminnow produced in Colorado on larval <br />abundance in the drift and in nursery habitats downstream in Utah. The report, "Annual <br />assessment of Colorado pikeminnow larval production in the Colorado River, Utah 1992- <br />1996" (Trammel and Chart, 1999a) was examined to identify longitudinal relationships <br />between drift abundance at Loma to two sites downstream in Utah. The report "Aspinal <br />unit studies: Evaluation of nursery habitat availability and Colorado pikeminnow young- <br />of-year habitat use in the Colorado River, Utah 1992-1996" (Trammel and Chart, 1999b) <br />was used to compared larval abundance in the drift to estimates of year-class strength <br />made by fall and spring backwater seining. <br /> <br />RESULTS <br /> <br />COLORADO COLLECTIONS <br /> <br />Larval Fish - Total Catch <br /> <br />A total of34,912 fish larvae and YOY were sampled in the drift over the course of <br />the study. Daily capture data for each species in the sample is included for the Loma and <br />the Middle Colorado River to indicate beginning and ending of drift season for each year <br />(Appendices 1, and 2). Season summary catch data for each station is given in Appendix <br />3. Loma consistently had the highest total catch ranging from 1,889 in 1994 to 6,321 fish <br />in 1995 (Appendix 1 Table 1). Either Upper Colorado River or Bridgeport had the lowest <br />catch in each of the five study years. More total native larval fish per effort were caught in <br />1995 than any other year and the highest catch rate for nonnative fish larvae was in 1992. <br />The lowest catch rate of native larval fish was in 1994 and 1996 produced the lowest <br />catch rate for nonnative fish larvae. <br /> <br />The timing of the catch was variable between the five study years. In 1995 <br />summer flows were high, late and cold and larval catch was very late in that summer <br />compared to other years. In 1995 very few native or non-native fish were collected in <br />drift nets during the entire month of July and the catch rates peaked in mid August 1995 <br />(Appendix 2, Figures 7 and 8). In 1994, a year with low, early and warm summer flows, <br />daily catch rates were highest in late June and few larval native fish were collected in <br />August (Appendix 2, Figure 5) <br />