Laserfiche WebLink
<br />siderations. The convenience of the Tennant method is an asset where fast, <br /> <br />liminary recommendations are needed. <br /> <br /> <br />The wetted perimeter method bases results on site-specific hydrologic infort <br /> <br />mation and subsequently possesses an assumption that wetted perimeter <br /> <br />reflect unique fish habitat dynamics in response to changes in flow. <br /> <br />logical assumption, however, it is not well documented in the literature. <br /> <br />Biologists using this method may have a difficult time convincing otherb"::;~utside <br /> <br />the fisheries profession that this assumption is valid without suppqrting field <br /> <br /> <br />observations. <br /> <br />Use of the curve may not be as much of a concern as the selection of a point <br /> <br />on the curve for the MF recommendation. Certainly the four statistically based <br /> <br />methods we used are defensible, each for its own reasoning, however, an imagina- <br /> <br />tive user could conceivably derive a great many more for other equally defen- <br /> <br />sible reasons. This is not necessarily a handicap as long as the user's reason <br /> <br />for using a statistical method is logical and defensible. <br /> <br />Subjectively identified inflection points resulted in fairly high numbers of <br /> <br />unbiased recommendation,s,' though no significant tendencies ,were found. <br /> <br />Still , <br /> <br />without supporting field observations, a biologist is basically asking others to <br /> <br />trus t his judgment. <br /> <br />This may be especially true where no clearly defined <br /> <br />inflection point exists or where several inflection points exist on a curve. <br />'I 0"0 <br /> <br /> <br />Our inability to show significant numbers of unbiased recommendations or <br /> <br />significant tendencies should not necessarily be viewed as a measure of the <br /> <br />the the .....etted perimeter methods in this study relative to real <br /> <br />15 <br />