My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7980
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 5:23:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7980
Author
Archer, D. L., H. M. Tyus and R. Valdez.
Title
Field Methodologies of the Fish and Wildlife Service's Colorado River Fisheries Project.
USFW Year
1980.
USFW - Doc Type
Denver, Colorado.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />15 <br /> <br />reaches and all habitats and by collecting physical as well as biological <br />information over the wide range of conditions present in the river. <br /> <br />Within each 0.5 mile intensively sampled reach, discrete habitat <br />types were delineated (Figure 2) and fish collections conducted within <br />them, rather than across several habitats. This permitted a delineation <br />of habitat preferences and associated depths, velocities nad substrates. <br /> <br />Sampling was not only stratified spatially, but also temporally. <br />Days were subdivided into one a.m. sampling period, one p.m. daylight <br />sampling period, and a darkness sampling period. A midday period of <br />sampling inactivity was reserved for equipment maintenance, travel and <br />personal activities of the crew (Figure 3). Daylight activities were <br />devoted to netting, trapping, electroshocking and physical/chemical <br />measurements. Activities during darkness were devoted to tending <br />nets, traps and some seining. <br /> <br />The annual sampling activities were scheduled relative to the <br />spring runoff, with sampling conducted before, during, and after <br />runoff (Figure 3). There was a period of inactivity each year when <br />the river was either frozen or the weather was to severe to safely <br />carry out sampling activities. <br /> <br />Physical Measurements <br /> <br />Sample sites were precisely located on river maps and aerial <br />photographs. Sketches were made of each 0.5 mile intensively sampled <br />reach illustrating the prevelance and juxtaposition of eight habtitat <br />categories (Table 2). <br /> <br />Three cross-sectional depth profiles were recorded at each 0.5 <br />mile intensive section using an electronic depth recorder. Depth <br />profiles were recorded at each end of the 0.5 mile sample sections and <br />at the mid-point of the section. <br /> <br />, <br />t <br />~ <br /> <br />Attempts were made to collect fish from every habitat present in <br />a sample reach. The habitat from which each fish sample was collected <br />was described by taking a series of depth and velocity measurements <br />and recording the substrate over which it was found. Bottom substrates <br />were classified according to the following scheme: <br /> <br />silt <br />sand <br />gravel <br />rubble <br />boulder <br />bedrock <br /> <br />fine gritty material <br />less than 33 mm diameter <br />33mm to 76 mm <br />76 mm to 305 mm <br />305 mm and larger <br />rock outcropping <br /> <br />Water quality measurements <br />site. These included dissolved <br />temperatures and conductivity. <br />pH and DO were taken between 10 <br /> <br />were taken at each intensive sample <br />oxygen, turbidity, air and water <br />Such variable parameters as temperature, <br />a.m. and 2 p.m. for standardization. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.