Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />15 <br /> <br />reaches and all habitats and by collecting physical as well as biological <br />information over the wide range of conditions present in the river. <br /> <br />Within each 0.5 mile intensively sampled reach, discrete habitat <br />types were delineated (Figure 2) and fish collections conducted within <br />them, rather than across several habitats. This permitted a delineation <br />of habitat preferences and associated depths, velocities nad substrates. <br /> <br />Sampling was not only stratified spatially, but also temporally. <br />Days were subdivided into one a.m. sampling period, one p.m. daylight <br />sampling period, and a darkness sampling period. A midday period of <br />sampling inactivity was reserved for equipment maintenance, travel and <br />personal activities of the crew (Figure 3). Daylight activities were <br />devoted to netting, trapping, electroshocking and physical/chemical <br />measurements. Activities during darkness were devoted to tending <br />nets, traps and some seining. <br /> <br />The annual sampling activities were scheduled relative to the <br />spring runoff, with sampling conducted before, during, and after <br />runoff (Figure 3). There was a period of inactivity each year when <br />the river was either frozen or the weather was to severe to safely <br />carry out sampling activities. <br /> <br />Physical Measurements <br /> <br />Sample sites were precisely located on river maps and aerial <br />photographs. Sketches were made of each 0.5 mile intensively sampled <br />reach illustrating the prevelance and juxtaposition of eight habtitat <br />categories (Table 2). <br /> <br />Three cross-sectional depth profiles were recorded at each 0.5 <br />mile intensive section using an electronic depth recorder. Depth <br />profiles were recorded at each end of the 0.5 mile sample sections and <br />at the mid-point of the section. <br /> <br />, <br />t <br />~ <br /> <br />Attempts were made to collect fish from every habitat present in <br />a sample reach. The habitat from which each fish sample was collected <br />was described by taking a series of depth and velocity measurements <br />and recording the substrate over which it was found. Bottom substrates <br />were classified according to the following scheme: <br /> <br />silt <br />sand <br />gravel <br />rubble <br />boulder <br />bedrock <br /> <br />fine gritty material <br />less than 33 mm diameter <br />33mm to 76 mm <br />76 mm to 305 mm <br />305 mm and larger <br />rock outcropping <br /> <br />Water quality measurements <br />site. These included dissolved <br />temperatures and conductivity. <br />pH and DO were taken between 10 <br /> <br />were taken at each intensive sample <br />oxygen, turbidity, air and water <br />Such variable parameters as temperature, <br />a.m. and 2 p.m. for standardization. <br />