Laserfiche WebLink
<br />PM INTERJURISDICTIONAL TRANSFERS <br /> <br />1:~ Unique Legal Issues Raised by Long Distance Water Transfer Proposals: ETSI, the Columbia River, <br />. tnn NAWAPA <br />.' \t9. Prof. Ralph W. Johnson, University ot Washington School ot Law, Seattle, Washington <br />L:,.. '.. Out-ot-state, out-ot-basin water transfer proposals such as ETSI, the Columbia to the Southwest, and NAWAPA, <br />raise unprecedente9 legal and policy issues, which the speaker will identify and analyze. <br /> <br />1 :50 ETSI Pipeline: the Future of an" Illusion <br />/ William Janklow, former Governor of South Dakota, Sioux Falls, South Dakota <br />j}' () With the ETSI Pipeline, South Dakota attempted to set its own economic agenda by selling Missouri River <br />fll PE J( water for industrial purposes outside the Missouri River basin. This paper will examine the history and aftermath <br />of the ETSI venture which, in light of the squabbles over western water, was an invitation to disaster. <br /> <br />2:35 <br /> <br />/11) <br /> <br />3:20 <br /> <br />3:40 <br /> <br />IY <br /> <br />.4:15 <br /> <br />5:00 <br /> <br />State Resource Sovereignty in a Post-Sporhase World: the Case of the Hueco Bolson <br />Prof. A. Dan Tarlock, Chicago-Kent College of Law, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago <br />The presentation will examine the efforts of EI Paso, Texas, to secure future water supplies by appropriating <br />groundwater in New Mexico and will focus on New Mexico's efforts to avoid sharing this resource in the <br />face of the Sporhase case. <br /> <br />Break <br /> <br />Montana's Response to Interjurisdictional Marketing Challenges <br />Deborah Beaumont Schmidt, Executive Director, Montana Environmental Quality Council <br />In 1985 Montana changed its water policy to respond to interjurisdictional marketing challenges and oppor- <br />tunities. Four years later, this attempt to integrate public interest and market approaches awaits stronger eco- <br />nomic demand for implementation of these innovations. <br /> <br />r- <br />i ; <br />!_/ <br /> <br />Marketing of Indian Reserved Water Rights <br />Jeanne Whiteing, Whiteing, Thompson & White, Boulder, Colorado <br />Considerable controversy and uncertainty exists about marketing ot Indian reserved water rights. This pre- <br />sentation will focus on the reasons for the controversy and recent developments in the area as reflected in <br />water rights settlements and federal policy. <br /> <br />Reception <br /> <br />Wednesday, June 7, 1989 <br /> <br />AM INTERJURISDICTIONAL COOPERATION <br /> <br />8:45 Integrating Interstate and Federal Natural Resource Policy in the Pacific Northwest: The Northwest <br />Power Planning Council <br />John M. Volkman, Senior Counsel, Northwest Power Planning Council, Portland, Oregon <br />p Since 1980 the Northwest states have developed regional energy, fish and wildlife policy through an interstate <br />compact agency, the Northwest Power Planning Council. The Council's conservation-oriented power plan <br />and its innovative fish and wildlife program attempt to balance the region's power and conservation needs. <br />The Northwest's experience may offer lessons for inteQ,rating water policy in other interstate basins. <br /> <br />The Northwest Power Planning Council-A Model for Cooperative Planning in the Missouri Basin? <br />Gerald Mueller, Consultant, Helena, Montana <br />The Northwest Power Planning Gouncil is the outstanding example of cooperative regional planning in the <br />country today. What are the factors key to its success, and how transferable are they to the Missouri River Basin? <br /> <br />9:30 <br /> <br />.~ <br /> <br />10:15 <br /> <br />Break <br />