Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2:05 <br /> <br />'F <br /> <br />2:55 <br /> <br />3:15 <br /> <br />4:05 <br /> <br />5:00 <br /> <br />6:00 <br /> <br />Managing the Upper Rio Grande: Old Institutions, New Players <br />Steven J. Shupe, Shupe & Associates, Santa Fe, New Mexico <br />The Upper Rio Grande Basin has been managed for irrigation and flood control for much of this cimtury ~ <br />under interstate compact and federal laws. These institutions, however, have been tested in recent year. ) <br />by a far more complex set of interests, including fisheries, recreation, river corridor protection, wildlife, India <br />rights, water marketing, water quality concerns and others. This presentation looks at possible mechanisms <br />for forming policy and resolving disputes about these issues. <br /> <br />Break <br /> <br />G <br /> <br />Interstate Allocation of the Platte River <br />Prof. J. David Aiken, Dept. of Agriculture & Economics, University of Nebraska <br />Early interstate disputes regarding allocation of Platte river \:Vater focused on irrigation uses. These conflicts <br />resulted in a U.S. Supreme Court decree on the North Platte between Nebraska and Wyoming, and an inter- <br />state compact between Nebraska and Colorado on the South Platte. More recent conflicts have focused <br />on environmental protection in the central Platte River in Nebraska. <br /> <br />)/ <br /> <br />The Arkansas River Controversy <br />David W. Robbins, Hill & Robbins, P.C., Denver <br />In December 1985, Kansas filed a lawsuit against Colorado alleging material depletions of the Arkansas River <br />in violation of the Arkansas River Compact. Colorado filed a counterclaim alleging various violations of the <br />same compact by Kansas. This presentation will describe the issues involved in the lawsuit and the current <br />status of the litigation. <br /> <br />End of day <br />Cookout on Flagstaff <br /> <br />e; <br /> <br />Tuesday, June 6, 1989 <br /> <br />AM 'BASIN STUDIES (con't) <br /> <br />8:45 Coordinated Water Management in a Basin with Erratic Surface Supplies: the Law North and South <br />of the Pecos <br />'1 Prof. Charles T. DuMars, University of New Mexico School of Law <br />This paper will explore the hydrology of the Pecos River Basin, the Interstate Compact regulating that basin <br />and the implications for state and national water planning strategies. <br /> <br />9:35 <br /> <br />T <br /> <br />The Delaware River Basin: Courts, Compacts & Commissions <br />R. Timothy Weston, Kirkpatrick & Lockhart, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania <br />Delaware River waters serve the four-state region of the northeast megalopolis. The 50-year experience of <br />litigation and compact commission programs provide a paradigm of maturing interstate management of shared <br />resources. A former Commissioner reflects on the lessons offered for other basins and. regions. <br /> <br />10:25 Break <br /> <br />The Missouri River: River of Promise or Peril? <br />John E. Thorson, Doney & Thorson, Helena, Montana <br />The Pick-Sloan Plan, authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1944, was the charter for natural resource <br />development in the Missouri River Basin. The promise of that charter has not been fulfilled and recent contro- <br />versies-most notably the ETSI Pipeline Project litigation-have resulted. This presentation reviews the <br />shortcomings of the Pick-Sloan Plan and describes recent efforts of the ten basin states, 27 Indian tribes, <br />and federal agencies to develop new water management approaches for the river. . ~ <br /> <br />11 :35 Lunch (on your own) <br /> <br />10:45 <br /> <br />^ <br />