Laserfiche WebLink
<br />INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW <br /> <br />Sound water policy must address the contemporary and <br />l~ng-te~ nec;ds of humans as pan of Ihe ecological commu- <br />nny. Nationally, we have not been using water in a manner <br />~ meers these needs on a sustainable basis. Examples <br />mclude the endangered Columbia River salmon, the over- <br />taxed San Francisco Bay Delta, the poisoned Kesterson <br />National Wildlife Refuge, the salt-choked Colorado River <br />the vanishing Ogalalla Aquifer, Louisiana's eroding De~ <br />New ~ort's p~arious Delaware River water supply, and <br />the dymg Flonda Everglades. The environmental costs of <br />CUI'1'eIU water policy are extraordinary, both to this and future <br />generations. <br /> <br />In America's past, water seemed abwldam and nature <br />forgiving. Federal funding was plentiful, and extensive <br />subsidies for development encouraged inefficient use of <br />water. Single interest water policies did not balance the <br />diversity of human and natural needs in water. In1ensive <br />eco~ic uses - agriculture, hydropower, flood control, <br />navigation, and urban development - became the dominant <br />forces in managing water. All too often, other concems - <br />including sound fiscal policy and the needs of Indian tribes. <br />other ethnic communities, and ecosystems - were ignored. <br />Federally financed water projects were built to control most <br />of the nation's surface water. These initiatives have accom- <br />plished .Jnsiderable societal benefits but have resulted in <br />enor" .5 expenditures and elaborate programs with inherent <br />COOl; ~ons, inefficiencies, and a lack of coordination. <br /> <br />The en of building major projects has passed. Neither <br />the economy nor the environment can tolerate more such <br />projects. It is time to reorient the federal role to satisfy new <br />needs consistent with a policy of sustainability. <br /> <br />A major movement toward water policy reform aiRady <br />is afoot at the local. state, tribal, regional, and federal levels. <br />Some examples of these innovations include stale and <br />federal programs for insIream flow proteCtion, poDution <br />prevention, recognitioo of the public interest, development <br />of watershed and regional water management appmacbes. <br />and comprehensive settlements of tribal reseJVed WIler <br />rights. The 0iDI0n Administration should build upon this <br />momentum, fulfilling A1do Leopold'. "Land Elhic" by <br />taking firm and responsible action to help create a visionary <br />approach toward America's waters. <br /> <br />A national water policy based on sustainability must <br />include a thorough re-examination of federal policies affect- <br />ing water quality and aquatic systems consistent with social <br />equity, economic efficiency, ecological integrity, and <br />continued commibDem to federal trust responsibilities to <br />tribes. Implementation of a truly national, DOt "federal. " <br />water policy requires the federal government to facilitate. <br />suppon. and help coordinate effons to optimize the effec- <br />tiveness of all levels of government - federal, state, tribal, <br />and local. <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />... <br /> <br />-- - <br /> <br />,- ' <br />