Laserfiche WebLink
<br />and has been observed in Lake Superior chinook salmon <br />(D. Schliep, MN Dept. Nat. Res., personal communication <br />1990). <br />Fluorescent spray-marking is an alternative to fin- <br />clipping for mass marking chinook salmon fingerlings. <br />Marking and identification procedures are economical, <br />efficient, easy to learn, require relatively simple <br />equipment, do not require excessive handling or <br />anesthetization, and have low mark-related mortality <br />(Phiruley et ale 1967; Pribble 1976, Chart and Bergersen <br />1988). Spray-marking fish with fluorescent pigments was <br />first described by Jackson (1959). Pigment granules are <br />sprayed with sufficient force to penetrate the epidermis <br />and dermis (Phinney et ale 1967). Results on a variety of <br />speci~s have indicated excellent short-term mark retention <br />and low mortality in fish marked after scale formation <br />(Phinney et ale 1967; Engelhardt 1977; Bandow 1987). <br />Experiments with scaleless fish and fry have been less <br />successful (Hennick and Tyler 1970; White 1976; Moodie and <br />Salfert 1982). Experiments with chinook and coho salmon <br />(Oncorhynchus kisutch) fingerlings have yielded <br />satisfactory short-term (<1 year) mark retention and <br />survival (Phinney and Mathews 1969, Bandow 1987). <br />Long-term pigment retention (>l year) has not been <br />extensively studied and results have been variable. <br />Andrews (1972) reported 100% pigment retention in fathead <br />minnows after nearly 2 years. Similar results were <br /> <br />2 <br />