Laserfiche WebLink
<br />INTRODUCTION <br />Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tsha~tscha) comprise <br />approximately 15% of the angler catch in Minnesota waters <br />of Lake Superior (D.. Schreiner, MN Dept. Nat. Res., <br />personal communication 1990), and Minnesota supplements <br />that population by annual stocking of 350,000 to 500,000 <br />fingerlings. Assessment of stocked chinook salmon is an <br />important component of Lake Superior management. Giving <br />each cohort a unique and readily-identifiable mark would <br />assist in assessing relative contributions of Minnesota <br />stocked chinook salmon to the sport fishery, straying and <br />migration patterns, and relative survival. Identifying <br />marks must be readily recognizable and retained for the <br />lifetime of the fish; must be economical; must not <br />adversely affect survival, growth, or behavior; and must <br />not increase vulnerability to predators or fishing gear <br />(Arnold 1966). <br />Fin-clipping has been the traditional marking method <br />for chinook salmon, and excision of the posterior portion <br />of the maxillary bone is becoming more popular. These <br />techniques require no specialized marking or identification <br />equipment, but they are labor-intensive when marking large <br />numbers of small fish. Differential survival and growth of <br />clipped fish may confound data interpretation (Weber and <br />Wahle 1969; Nicola and Cordone 1973; Phinney 1974). Fin <br />regeneration, particularly in fish clipped at a small size, <br />has also been noted (Shetter 1950; Hale 1954; Mears 1976) <br /> <br />1 <br />