My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9304
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9304
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:34 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 5:10:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9304
Author
Mueller, G., L. Boobar, R. Wydoski and K. Comella.
Title
Aquatic Survey of the Lower Escalante River, Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, Utah; June 22-26, 1998.
USFW Year
1998.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />from each seine haul were held in live nets. Following sampling, fish were identified, counted, <br />measured and weighted. <br /> <br />Fyke Net--A single throated fyke net constructed of 6 mm nylon netting, 2.5 m in length, with <br />two 76 cm hoops was set with the entrance facing downstream in deep channels where velocities <br />held the net upright. Time of sets ranged from 1 to 10 hours. <br /> <br />Minnow Traps-- Two collapsible, 2 mm mesh minnow traps (30 cm x 30 cm x 45 cm) were set it <br />in slack water habitats near shore. Time of sets ranged from 1 to 10 hours. <br /> <br />Trammel Net--A 15 cm outer and 1.2 cm inter panels trammel net measuring 1.3 by 15 m was set <br />in or near deeper holes or backwaters. Trammel nets were typically set overnight. <br /> <br />RESULTS <br /> <br />Physical measurements were taken at the first 5 sampling sites where the river was smaller, more <br />channelized and could effectively be seined (Table 2.1). The primary purpose of measuring <br />sample area was to calculate fish densities and biomass per surface area or habitat volume. <br />Unfortunately, due to high flows and velocities (>3.0m3/>lm/s) it was not possible to effectively <br />seine the study sites. Seining was difficult for the lack of suitable sites and high (> 1 mlsec) river <br />velocities. Appropriate seining sites having suitable depth, velocities, and unobstructed reaches <br />were uncommon. This might not be the case at lower flows. <br /> <br />We also had problems fIDding sites with adequate depth (> 1 m) and lengths (>3 m) to set the <br />fyke net. The trammel net proved to be the biggest challenge. There were essentially no <br />backwater or pool habitats. We would normally set a portion of the trammel net (<7 m) in eddie <br />pools behind large boulders. The net was fished 3 nights, 2 of which produced fish. The <br />trammel produced the second highest species diversity: roundtail chub, flannelmouth sucker, <br />carp, and stripped bass. It also provided good information on adult fish that are difficult to seine <br />and provide information on reproductive status. <br /> <br />Insufficient data was collected to allow density or biomass estimates. Field information is <br />limited to individual fish data, relative abundance, and species persence. Stream measurements <br />were not taken at sites 6, 7, and 8. <br /> <br />Fish--Survey efforts yielded 306 fish, representing eleven species (Table 2.2). We encountered <br />two new species, yellow bullhead and striped bass new not previously reported for the drainage <br />and brown trout which were not reported that far downstream by Holden and Irving (1975). We <br />did not encountered largemouth bass nor bluehead sucker which were previously reported. <br /> <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.