Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />INTRODUcnON <br /> <br />Declines in populations of fIShes native to the Colorado River System have been attributed to <br />modification or loss of habitat and interactions with nonnative fish species (Behnke and Benson 1983; <br />Stanford and Ward 1986; Hawkins and Nesler 1991; Minckley 1991). Flow and temperature patterns and <br />channel morphology of mainstem and tnDutary rivers have been greatly altered by water-development <br />projects, and introduced nonnative fishes are now numerically predominant in most fish communities. <br />Successful protection, management, and recovery of natural elements of the Colorado River System require <br />an understanding of relationships among present physical and biological conditions. <br />Studies conducted by the Colorado Division of Wildlife during 1980-1984 on habitat requirements <br />and limiting factors for rare native fishes of the Upper Colorado River System concentrated on <br />reproduction and early life history of the endangered humpback chub Gila cypha and Colorado squawfish <br />Ptychocheilus lucius (Haynes et al. 1985). These studies included extensive sampling of small fishes <br />(primarily age-O) in low-velocity nursery habitats of the lower Yampa River. Data on distribution and <br />numeric abundance of native and nonnative fIShes were produced from this sampling effort. Our primary <br />objective was to funher analyze these data and associate resulting information on annual spawning periods <br />and relative abundance of young of selected fISh species with annual spring-summer flow and temperature <br />regimes of the lower Yampa River. We compared our findings with results of other studies conducted in <br />the Upper Colorado River System. <br /> <br />STUDY AREA <br /> <br />The Yampa River, located in northwestern Colorado, is the principal tributary of the Green River <br />and the only large river in the Colorado River Basin not greatly affected by water-development projects <br />(Carlson and Muth 1989; Tyus and Karp 1989). Along its approximately 320-km course, the Yampa River <br />drops in elevation about 2,255 m and enlarges to a sixth-order stream before joining the Green River <br />(Joseph et al. 1977; Behnke et al. 1982). Major aquatic-habitat zones of the Yampa River include a <br />mountainous headwater zone with cold and clear water, an intermediate zone with cool to tepid and <br />occasionally turbid water flowing through cottonwood bottomlands and agricultural valleys, and a lower <br />zone with warm and usually turbid water flowing through deep lime- and sandstone canyons. The present <br />flow regime of the Yampa River appears to approximate historic annual and seasonal patterns and is <br />characterized by variable low-, average-, or high-flow years; high flows in spring and early summer; and low <br />Oows during late summer through winter (Haynes and Bennett 1986; Tyus and Karp 1989). Tyus and Karp <br />(1989) summarized U.S. Geological Survey flow records for the Yampa River from 1922 through 1987 and <br />reponed that daily discharge averaged about 61 m3/s annually, 153 m3/s during spring runoff in April <br />through July, and 14 m3/s per month for August through March. <br />