Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Final Report <br /> <br />3-6 <br /> <br />September 2000 <br /> <br />began in 1967. In the second phase, from 1967 to 1978, Flaming Gorge Dam was operated with few <br />constraints, and water releases were made from deep within the reservoir through the single outlet <br />structure. The only constraint on releases during that period was the 23 m3/s minimum release to <br />establish and maintain the tailwater trout fishery (Smith and Green 1991). The dam was retrofitted <br />with a multilevel outlet to improve water temperatures for the tailwater trout fishery in 1978. Aside <br />from the use ofthe multilevel outlet structure, operations in the third phase, from 1979 to 1984, were <br />similar to those in the previous phase (Smith and Green 1991). <br /> <br />An interim flow agreement was established in 1985 to change Flaming Gorge Dam releases <br />to protect endangered fish nursery habitats in the Green River downstream of Jensen, Utah (Smith <br />and Green 1991). The interim agreement provided for a maximum release volume of <br />123.4 million m3 in August and September, with daily fluctuations at the dam between 23 and <br />68 m3/s. The recommended releases were based on observations made in 1985 that indicated that <br />"good" habitat conditions were available at lower flows. Reclamation also changed operational <br />criteria at the dam to avoid spills, such as those that occurred in 1983 and 1984. These changes were <br />in place in the fourth phase, from 1985 through 1992, along with numerous research releases to <br />support preparation of the 1992 Biological Opinion. <br /> <br />Most recently, in the fifth phase, operations at Flaming Gorge Dam have incorporated <br />recommendations of the 1992 Biological Opinion, including providing flows needed for the Flaming <br />Gorge Flow Recommendations Investigation (Section 1.3). Flows recommended in the Biological <br />Opinion were intended to restore a more natural hydro graph and protect nursery habitats of <br />endangered fishes downstream of the Yampa Ri ver confluence. The Biological Opinion called for <br />a full power-plant-capacity release (133 m3/s) each spring and included recommendations for target <br />flows in summer and autumn (31 to 51 m3/s), with fluctuations in flow at Jensen constrained to 25% <br />of target flow to protect nursery habitats in this reach. Releases during the winter were held steady <br />once an ice cover formed in the Jensen area (generally December through February) to protect <br />endangered fish habitats. <br /> <br />3.3 DESCRIPTION OF GREEN RIVER REACHES DOWNSTREAM OF FLAMING <br />GORGE DAM <br /> <br />The longitudinal profile of the Green River downstream from Flaming Gorge Dam includes <br />steep and flat segments, and the gradients of these segments do not systematically decrease in a <br />downstream direction (Figure 3.2). In general, low-gradient reaches of the river have sandy <br />substrates, but segments with steeper gradients have gravel or cobble substrates (Schmidt 1996). For <br />this report, the Green River is divided into three reaches delimited by major tributaries (Figure 2.1). <br /> <br />Reach 1, between Flaming Gorge Dam and the Yampa River confluence, is about 104 kIn <br />in length (Figure 2.1). Flow in this reach is measured at the USGS gage near Greendale, Utah. <br />Reach 1 is straight to meandering and, with the exception of Browns Park, tightly confined by the <br /> <br />~ <br />