Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Final Report <br /> <br />3-5 <br /> <br />September 2000 <br /> <br />Table 3.2.-Estimated depletions in the Green River system in 1998. <br /> <br />Drainal!e <br />Upper Green River (upstream of Greendale, Utah) <br />Yampa River <br />White River <br />Duchesne River <br />Price River <br />San Rafael River <br /> <br />Estimated 1998 DeDletion (1 000 000 m3)3 <br />567 <br /> <br />231 <br /> <br />59 <br />585 <br /> <br />30 <br /> <br />121 <br /> <br />a Depletions were estimated by using the Colorado River Simulation System (CRSS) within the <br />RiverWare modeling framework. Other approaches to calculating depletions may yield different <br />results. <br /> <br />snowpack and monthly runoff forecasts, an appropriate winter draw down is selected to avoid spills; <br />it usually results in a minimum reservoir storage of approximately 987 million m3 at a reservoir <br />surface elevation of 1,836 m. Minimum reservoir elevations are usually achieved by 1 April each <br />year. In years when snowpack is greater than normal, releases are increased in middle and late winter <br />and result in additional draw down. Following drawdown, attempts are made to refill the reservoir <br />during spring runoff, with maximum reservoir levels usually occurring in late July each year. <br />Releases during the remainder of the year are generally patterned to meet energy demands while <br />meeting the constraints identified above. Peak demand for electric power occurs during summer <br />(July through September) and winter (December through February). <br /> <br />Water releases from the dam for power generation have ranged from about 23 to 130 m3/s. <br />The maximum power-generating release3 is constrained by the size of the turbines, whereas the lower <br />limit (23 m3/s) is set by an agreement with the State of Utah to maintain a high-quality trout fishery <br />in dam tailwaters. An additional 113 m3/s of water can be released through two steel bypass tubes <br />(56.5 m3/s each), and 793 m3/s can be discharged through the spillway tunnel, but water passing <br />through these structures produces no electric power. Although power plant releases from the dam <br />are capable of fluctuating from 23 to 130 m3/s to meet power commitments, actual daily operations <br />are constrained to meet criteria presented in the 1992 Biological Opinion (USFWS 1992), usually <br />by reducing the magnitude of (or eliminating) daily fluctuations in flow or by reducing the amount <br />of time that peak releases are maintained. <br /> <br />The history of Flaming Gorge Dam operations can be divided into five phases. In the first <br />phase, from 1963 to 1966, Flaming Gorge Reservoir was filling with water, and flows downstream <br />of the dam were much reduced (Smith and Green 1991). The first full year of normal operations <br /> <br />3In this report, maximum power plant capacity is reported as 130 m3/s, which is the typical historic maximum <br />release value. With a recent system upgrade, power plant capacity releases up to 140 m3/s are possible but depend on <br />reservoir water-surface elevation. <br />