Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Final Report <br /> <br />4-7 <br /> <br />September 2000 <br /> <br />regulations, mechanical removal, chemical eradication, and management of flows to benefit native <br />fishes and suppress the abundance of nonnative fishes. The last option is important in the context <br />of this report because occasional high or very high spring flows, and summer conditions resulting <br />from higher spring flows, have been correlated with reduced abundance of channel catfish (Chart <br />and Lentsch 1999) and nonnative cyprinids in shoreline habitats of the Colorado, Yampa, Green, and <br />San Juan Rivers (McAda and Kaeding 1989; Haines and Tyus 1990; Muth and Nesler 1993; Gido <br />et al. 1997; McAda and Rye11999; Trammell and Chart 1999). Effects of high spring flows on many <br />of the common native fish species have been neutral to positi ve (e.g., Muth and Nesler 1993; McAda <br />and RyeI1999), but short-term decreases of some native fishes, including Colorado pikeminnow, <br />have been documented (Haines and Tyus 1990; Tyus and Haines 1991; McAda and RyeI1999). <br />Exact mechanisms for lowered abundance of nonnative fishes associated with higher spring flows <br />are unknown but may include (1) flushing fish downstream; (2) reducing their ability to successfully <br />reproduce (high flows that persist later into the summer are often cold and may also reduce the <br />abundance of warm-water nonnative fishes by inhibiting early spawning or reducing hatching <br />success [Muth and Nesler 1993]); (3) reducing backwater habitat where many of these species <br />complete their entire life cycle; or (4) a combination of the three mechanisms. Concerns exist within <br />the Recovery Program about overbank flooding associated with high spring flows and the potential <br />beneficial effects of floodplain inundation on the abundance of nonnative fishes in rivers. <br />Preliminary conclusions by Crowl et al. (1998b) indicate that although the density of nonnative <br />fishes in the middle Green River exhibited localized increases associated with floodplain inundation <br />and draining, those increases were temporary. They also reported that preliminary evidence suggests <br />patterns of weak, inconsistent interactions between native and nonnative fishes in floodplain sites. <br />