Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Final Report <br /> <br />4-6 <br /> <br />September 2000 <br /> <br />tailwater releases, which are managed not to exceed 130C, are well below the 170C optimum <br />temperature for growth of nonnative rainbow trout (Hokanson et al. 1977), the main species of <br />interest in the tailwaterfishery. Native fishes also benefitted from thermal enhancement ofthe Green <br />River. Within 6 months after .the penstock modifications, Holden and Crist (1981) documented <br />re-invasion and reproduction by common warm-water native fishes and nonnati ve fishes in the Green <br />River upstream of the Yampa River confluence. The presence of adult Colorado pikeminnow and <br />razorback suckers was documented, but reproduction by either species was not observed, and <br />humpback chubs and bonytails were not found. Filbert and Hawkins (1995) suggested that increasing <br />the temperature of releases from Flaming Gorge Dam to levels greater than l30C may improve <br />thermal conditions for tailwater trout and for native fishes downstream. <br /> <br />4.1.2 Nonnative Fishes <br /> <br />A total of 25 nonnative fish species in nine families has been reported from reaches of the <br />main-stem Green River between Flaming Gorge Dam and the Colorado River confluence and from <br />lower portions of tributaries (see Table 4.2 at the end of this section). Of the cool- or warm-water <br />nonnative fishes, red shiner, common carp, sand shiner, fathead minnow, and channel catfish are <br />widespread and common to abundant; redside shiner, white sucker, black bullhead, northern pike, <br />green sunfish, and smallmouth bass are locally rare to common in some river reaches or habitats; and <br />grass carp, Utah chub, creek chub, Utah sucker, western mosquitofish, brook stickleback, bluegill, <br />largemouth bass, black crappie, and walleye are incidental to rare. Salmonids are generally restricted <br />to Reach 1 and are most abundant in the tail waters of Flaming Gorge Dam. <br /> <br />Nonnative fishes dominate the ichthyofauna of Colorado River basin rivers and have been <br />implicated as contributing to reductions in the distribution and abundance of native fishes as a result <br />of competition and predation (Carlson and Muth 1989). Behnke and Benson (1983) attributed the <br />dominance of nonnative fishes to dramatic changes in flow regimes, water quality, and habitat <br />characteristics. They reported that water development has converted a turbulent, highly variable river <br />system into a relatively stable system, with flow and temperature patterns that allowed for the <br />proliferation of nonnative fish species. Hawkins and Nesler (1991) identified red shiner, common <br />carp, fathead minnow, channel catfish, northern pike, and green sunfish as the nonnatives considered <br />by Colorado River basin researchers to be of greatest concern because of their suspected or <br />documented negative interactions with native fishes. Sand shiner, white sucker, black bullhead, <br />smallmouth bass, and largemouth bass were identified by Hawkins and Nesler (1991) as nonnatives <br />of increasing concern because of their increasing abundance, habitat preferences, and/or piscivorous <br />habits. Life histories of nonnative fishes in the upper Colorado River basin and their potential effects <br />on native fishes were reviewed by Lentsch et al. (1996b). <br /> <br />Lentsch et al. (1996b) and Tyus and Saunders (1996) presented options for controlling <br />nonnative fishes in the upper Colorado River basin. Those options included more restrictive stocking <br />protocols, reduction or elimination of escape from existing stocks, more liberalized harvest <br />