My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8188
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8188
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:57:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8188
Author
Muth, R. T., et al.
Title
Flow and Temperature Recommendations for Endangered Fishes in the Green River Downstream of Flaming Forge Dam.
USFW Year
2000.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
334
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Final Report <br /> <br />4-6 <br /> <br />September 2000 <br /> <br />tailwater releases, which are managed not to exceed 130C, are well below the 170C optimum <br />temperature for growth of nonnative rainbow trout (Hokanson et al. 1977), the main species of <br />interest in the tailwaterfishery. Native fishes also benefitted from thermal enhancement ofthe Green <br />River. Within 6 months after .the penstock modifications, Holden and Crist (1981) documented <br />re-invasion and reproduction by common warm-water native fishes and nonnati ve fishes in the Green <br />River upstream of the Yampa River confluence. The presence of adult Colorado pikeminnow and <br />razorback suckers was documented, but reproduction by either species was not observed, and <br />humpback chubs and bonytails were not found. Filbert and Hawkins (1995) suggested that increasing <br />the temperature of releases from Flaming Gorge Dam to levels greater than l30C may improve <br />thermal conditions for tailwater trout and for native fishes downstream. <br /> <br />4.1.2 Nonnative Fishes <br /> <br />A total of 25 nonnative fish species in nine families has been reported from reaches of the <br />main-stem Green River between Flaming Gorge Dam and the Colorado River confluence and from <br />lower portions of tributaries (see Table 4.2 at the end of this section). Of the cool- or warm-water <br />nonnative fishes, red shiner, common carp, sand shiner, fathead minnow, and channel catfish are <br />widespread and common to abundant; redside shiner, white sucker, black bullhead, northern pike, <br />green sunfish, and smallmouth bass are locally rare to common in some river reaches or habitats; and <br />grass carp, Utah chub, creek chub, Utah sucker, western mosquitofish, brook stickleback, bluegill, <br />largemouth bass, black crappie, and walleye are incidental to rare. Salmonids are generally restricted <br />to Reach 1 and are most abundant in the tail waters of Flaming Gorge Dam. <br /> <br />Nonnative fishes dominate the ichthyofauna of Colorado River basin rivers and have been <br />implicated as contributing to reductions in the distribution and abundance of native fishes as a result <br />of competition and predation (Carlson and Muth 1989). Behnke and Benson (1983) attributed the <br />dominance of nonnative fishes to dramatic changes in flow regimes, water quality, and habitat <br />characteristics. They reported that water development has converted a turbulent, highly variable river <br />system into a relatively stable system, with flow and temperature patterns that allowed for the <br />proliferation of nonnative fish species. Hawkins and Nesler (1991) identified red shiner, common <br />carp, fathead minnow, channel catfish, northern pike, and green sunfish as the nonnatives considered <br />by Colorado River basin researchers to be of greatest concern because of their suspected or <br />documented negative interactions with native fishes. Sand shiner, white sucker, black bullhead, <br />smallmouth bass, and largemouth bass were identified by Hawkins and Nesler (1991) as nonnatives <br />of increasing concern because of their increasing abundance, habitat preferences, and/or piscivorous <br />habits. Life histories of nonnative fishes in the upper Colorado River basin and their potential effects <br />on native fishes were reviewed by Lentsch et al. (1996b). <br /> <br />Lentsch et al. (1996b) and Tyus and Saunders (1996) presented options for controlling <br />nonnative fishes in the upper Colorado River basin. Those options included more restrictive stocking <br />protocols, reduction or elimination of escape from existing stocks, more liberalized harvest <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.