Laserfiche WebLink
<br />34 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />"blended stock" being used to restore Colorado and Gunnison river populations. <br />For downlisting, one Upper Basin population, one population located in either the <br />Upper or Lower Basin, the Lake Mojave population and the two Green River <br />populations are necessary. For delisting, these populations and one additional <br />population in both the Upper and Lower Basins, for a total of seven, is required. <br /> <br />Abundance requirements were specified in the razorback sucker recovery <br />plan (USFWS 1998), specifying 50,000 adult fish in Lake Mojave, 5,000 adult fish <br />in the middle Green River, and 2,000 adult fish in the lower Green River. In 1995, <br />the Lake Mojave population was estimated at about 25,000 fish (Minckley et al. <br />1991, Marsh 1995). The significant genetic diversity established for this population <br />(Dowling and Minckley 1993, Dowling et al. 1996) has not been re-evaluated in <br />light of this decline. Unconfirmed reports from Lower Basin researchers suggest <br />the Lake Mojave population has declined even further to slightly less than 10,000 <br />fish. Using genetic criteria similar to Colorado pikeminnow with Ne=1000, <br />Ne/N=0.5, and a sex ratio of 3M;1F, a minimum abundance requirement for <br />genetic viability would be 2,700 adult fish. One of the recognized threats to this <br />species is a very high percent mortality of progeny resulting in near complete <br />recruitment failure. As such, existing razorback sucker adults have a very low <br />probability of contributing to succeeding generations. A representative mortality <br />rate for a self-sustaining razorback sucker population is unknown, therefore, until <br />new information on this parameter is gained, a conservative 100% rate is used <br />here to determine a buffer to the genetic minimum. This results in an abundance <br />requirement of 5,400 adult fish. <br /> <br />Utah's razorback sucker stocking plan (Hudson et at 1999) specifies 5,316 <br />adult fish as an end product for both the middle and lower reaches of the Green <br />River. These stocking objectives were based on Lentsch et al. (1998), which <br />quantified a viable population size for razorback sucker necessary to maintain <br />genetic viability and demographic stability. Viability was defined in Lentsch et al. <br />(1998) as a 95% chance of persistence for 100 years. Utah's stocking plan <br />approaches the restoration of razorback sucker in the Green River as two <br />population segments. The razorback populations in the middle and lower reaches <br />of the Green River will be genetically linked through shared brood stock under the <br />Utah stocking plan as well as likely transfer of wild adult fish and downstream <br />displacement of larval fish between the two river reaches. The resultant density of <br />adult razorback sucker under the Utah stocking plan would be almost 31 fish/mile. <br />Under Colorado's endangered fish stocking plan (Nesler 1998), an objective of <br />three adult populations (population segments) was set for the Colorado. and <br />Gunnison rivers. A stocking objective of 475 adult fish/mile as a target was <br />established for each population/river reach. This density objective was derived <br />using fish population biomass data for the upper Colorado River between Rifle and <br />Palisade, Colorado (Anderson 1997), an average length-weight criterion for adult <br />razorback at first maturity at age 5, and a target razorback adult biomass of 5% of <br />the Anderson (1997) total fish biomass estimate. In the San Juan River, the <br />stocking objective for razorback sucker was set at 10% of existing abundance of <br />