Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Razorback sucker <br /> <br />Status and Trends The status and trend of this species is evident in the <br />disappearance or decline of riverine populations (USFWS1998). The information <br />available for this species shows it's range and abundance has declined such that <br />only one wild riverine population and one reservoir population of any numerical <br />significance remain (middle Green River and Lake Mojave). Recruitment in the <br />middle Green River population appears inadequate to stabilize abundance (Modde <br />et al. 1996) and recruitment in the Lake Mojave population is sustained through an <br />on-site spawning and growout operation for augmentation stocking back into the <br />reservoir (Mueller 1995). It is clear that recovery of the razorback sucker from its <br />current federal status as endangered will require restoration stocking to develop <br />adult populations, and mitigation of existing threats to enable reproductive success <br />and self-sustaining natural recruitment. Available historic data was inadequate to <br />provide a specific assessment of population abundance, trends, recruitment and <br />size structure similar to the Colorado pikeminnow and humpback chub. <br /> <br />Recovery Goals and Criteria Historical population demographic data for a <br />viable, riverine population of razorback sucker is unavailable to use as a template <br />for recovery goal development as was done for the Colorado pikeminnow and <br />humpback chub. The recovery plan (USFWS 1998) calls for five populations for <br />downlisting and seven populations for delisting. With the exception of the Lake <br />Mojave population, the remaining populations must be maintained by natural <br />recruitment. The genetics management plan for Upper Basin (Czapla 1999) <br />identifies three presumptive populations, including the Middle Green River, Lower <br />Green River, and Upper Colorado River. For the purpose of identifying recovery <br />goals and criteria, these two guidance documents are different only in their degree <br />of specificity concerning populations identified. <br /> <br />The recovery plan identifies populations necessary for recovery specifically <br />in Lake Mojave, the middle Green River, and the lower Green River. The genetics <br />management plan for the Upper Basin goes one step further in identifying the <br />Upper Colorado River as a targeted population. The recovery plan recommends <br />five potential population sites upon which to achieve the recovery goal of four <br />razorback sucker populations additional to the three identified. These include the <br />Salt and Verde rivers in the Lower Basin, and the Colorado, Gunnison, and San <br />Juan rivers in the-Upper Basin. Presently, restoration stocking of razorback sucker <br />has occurred in the San Juan, Verde, Salt, and Gunnison rivers. At this time, <br />hatchery-reared razorback sucker have survived and reached reproductive status <br />in the San Juan River (Ryden 2000). Fish stocked in the San Juan River were <br />progeny derived from adults collected in the San Juan River arm of Lake Powell. <br />Fish stocked in the Gunnison River were derived from adult razorback sucker from <br />the upper Colorado River, Etter Pond (near Palisade, Colorado) and the Colorado <br />River arm and San Juan River arms of Lake Powell. The direction of genetics <br />management for razorback sucker is to maintain Upper Basin and Lake Mojave <br />stocks separately, and to maintain Green River stocks separately from the <br /> <br />33 <br />