Laserfiche WebLink
<br />20 <br />15 <br />10 <br />5 <br />o <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Figure 3. Estimated population size based 86% survival rates a d annual <br />recruitment % for Colorado pikeminnow marked and recaptured with PIT tags in <br />the White River from 1992-1997. <br /> <br />White R iv ere PM Pop E s tim ate <br />86% s u rv ivai ra te <br /> <br />en <br />o <br />2 <br /> <br />1200 <br />1000 <br />800 <br />600 <br />400 <br />200 <br />o <br /> <br />~ - ~ X <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />199219931994199519961997 <br /> <br />Yea rs <br /> <br />. E stim ate <br />A "+95% <br /> <br />IB "-95% <br />~ -X - % recruit@ 351 <br /> <br />Figure 4. Estimated population size based 86% survival rates a d annual <br />recruitment % for Colorado pikeminnow marked and recaptured with P T tags in <br />the Yampa-Little Snake Rivers from 1992-1997. <br /> <br />Yampa-L. Snake CPM Pop Estimate <br />86% survival rate <br /> <br />700 <br />600 <br />500 <br />en 400 <br />~ 300 <br />200 <br />100 <br />o <br /> <br /> <br />1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 <br />Year <br /> <br />. E s ti mate <br />A "+95% <br /> <br />. "-95% <br />- ~.)( - % re cruit@ 401 <br /> <br />16 <br /> <br />25 <br /> <br />20 <br />15 <br />10 <br />5 <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />~ <br />o <br />