Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />data for these populations at the frequency specified (Table A-4). For population <br />structure requirements, the only difference between downlisting and delisting is an <br />increase in the percentage of the ~350 mm size category for the Colorado River <br />population and the ~601 mm size group for the Green River population. <br /> <br />Figure 1. Estimated population size based on 86% survival rates and annual <br />recruitment % for Colorado pikeminnow marked and recaptured with PIT tags in <br />the Colorado-Gunnison Rivers from 1991-1997. <br /> <br />Colorado-Gunnison CPM Pop. Estimate <br />86% survival rate <br /> <br />2000 <br />1500 <br /> <br />40 <br /> <br />X. <br /> <br /> <br />30 <br /> <br />ui <br />o 1000 <br />:2 <br /> <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />: <br /> <br />: <br /> <br />20 ';fl. <br /> <br />500 <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />~ vX.. " X <br />hX ~ . .x - ~ ~ <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 <br /> <br />Yea rs <br /> <br />. Estimate <br />~ "+95% <br /> <br />III "-95% <br />. "x. ,. % recruit@351 <br /> <br />Figure 2. Estimated population size based on 86% survival rates and annual <br />recruitment % for Colorado pikeminnow marked and recaptured with PIT tags in <br />the Green-Duchesne-Price Rivers from 1991-1997. <br /> <br />Green River CPM Pop Estimate <br />86% survival rate <br /> <br />ui <br />o <br />:2 <br /> <br />12000 <br />10000 <br />8000 <br />6000 <br />4000 <br />2000 <br />o <br /> <br /> <br />25 <br /> <br />20 <br /> <br />15 <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />5 <br />o <br /> <br />';fl. <br /> <br />199219931994199519961997 <br /> <br />Year <br /> <br />. E stim ate <br />A "+95% <br /> <br />. "-95% <br />" ":x . %recruit@351 <br /> <br />15 <br />