My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8020
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:50:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8020
Author
Horak, G. C.
Title
Proceedings of the Symposium on Mitigating Developmental Impacts on Fish and Wildlife.
USFW Year
1979.
USFW - Doc Type
March 1979.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
145
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />,I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />serious and consistent violations of the flow during the nonirrigation season. <br />Although the FWS did monitor the status of the project in 1971, the monitoring <br />resulted in a positive change for less than two years, and the project operators <br />wer~ not penalized for violations. Interestingly, the month the FWS follow-up <br />study was published, the monthly average flow dropped below the agreed-to flow <br />and remained there fOr six months. Again in 1974, the operator viola~ed the <br />agreement and again agreed to abide by it. <br />Because of the above circumstances, the state fish and wildlife agency <br />found it necessary to stock fingerling and legal-sized trout to maintain a <br />fishery. This is a costly procedure which would not have been needed had the <br />original FWS recommendation been implemented. <br />Monitoring by fish and wildlife interests, although irregular, aided the <br />imp1 ementati on of the recommended f1 ow, but only for short interval s. Fi sh <br />and wildlife interests were compelled to resort to lengthy and cumbersome pro- <br />cedures, such as presenting the dam operator with substantive findings or <br />working through members of the sponsori ng agency, in order to convince the <br />dam operator to' release the accepted flow recommendation. No other means <br />were available to persuade the operator to adhere to the recommendation. <br />The effectiveness of imp1ementated measures is another test of FWCA <br />success. Such measures include both those accepted by the sponsoring agen- <br />cies as recommended by the fish and wildlife agencies and those modified <br />before acceptance and implementation. Although a number of approaches could <br />be followed, in a study for the Fish and Wildlife Service (8) the effective- <br />ness of measures was evaluated on the basis of how well the measure achieved <br />its intended purpose. Each application of a measure was classified as success- <br />ful, marginally successful, or unsuccessful. If an 'indiVidua1 measure appar- <br />ently accomplished a major proportion of its intended purpose, it was classified <br />as successful. If only a moderate part of its intended purpose was attained, it <br /> <br />20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.