My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8142
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8142
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:49:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8142
Author
Horn, M. J.
Title
Nutritional Limitation of Recruitment in the Razorback Sucker (
USFW Year
1996.
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
313
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />66 <br /> <br />W=aLb. <br />The test of log-linearity was accomplished by fitting a second-order polynomial term to <br />residuals of the log-linear regression model (Y = a + bL + cL2, where Y are the residuals <br /> <br /> <br />and L is the Log-transformed length). A second-order coefficient, c, not significantly <br /> <br /> <br />different from zero indicates no departure from log-linearity. If significant departures are <br /> <br /> <br />detected, the more complex Gompertz model would be utilized (pepin 1995): <br /> <br />LogW = i + bLogLc + e. <br /> <br /> <br />Equality of slopes between treatments was tested using an analysis of covariance with <br /> <br /> <br />length as a covariate. Significant differences in slope between treatments indicated the <br /> <br /> <br />relationship between length and weight as larvae grew were on different trajectories for <br /> <br />each treatment. <br /> <br />For all analyses, pre-feeding (yolk-sac) larvae were excluded. Pre-feeding larvae <br /> <br />typically do not fit the log-linear growth curve, so a plot of the mean-variance ratio of <br /> <br /> <br />weight against length class was used to determine the minimum cutoff size (Murphy et al. <br /> <br />1990). <br /> <br /> <br />To determine the efficacy of using lipids, weight, and length to distinguish among <br /> <br /> <br />feeding levels, discriminant function analyses were conducted for laboratory larvae at <br /> <br /> <br />each temperature. Reclassification of data based on the discriminant function was used as <br /> <br /> <br />an index of how well variables distinguished among the different groups. In addition, <br /> <br /> <br />cross-comparisons were made where the discriminant function from one experiment was <br /> <br /> <br />used to classify individuals from another. Reclassification using the two data sets avoids <br />the circularity of testing a discriminant model with the same data used to build it. In a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.