My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7144
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7144
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:29 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:48:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7144
Author
Inslee, T. D.
Title
Spawning and Hatching of the Razorback Sucker
USFW Year
1982
USFW - Doc Type
Western Association of Fish & Game Agencies
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />caught were identified, enumerated, measured, and returned alive to <br />the river. Fish over 200 mm were marked with individually numbered <br />spaghetti tags. Rare fishes over 200 mm were marked with fingerling <br />tags. <br />Benthic macroinvertebrates were sampled with a modified Hess <br />sampler at the three sites mentioned above. Three replicates were <br />taken at each site in cobbled areas of similar depth. The samples <br />were preserved in 70% ETOH and transferred to BIO/WEST's invertebrate <br />laboratory in Logan, Utah, for analysis. The samples were sorted and <br />identified to the lowest practical taxonomic level. Samples containing <br />a large number of organisms were subsampled using a rotary subsampler. <br />Plankton were sampled monthly at the same three sites. Twenty- <br />five liters of water were filtered through a 80 u mesh plankton net <br />and the contents preserved in 3% formalin. Three replicates were taken <br />at each station. The samples were analyzed for species present and <br />relative abundance of both zoo- and phytoplankton. <br />Periphyton was also sampled monthly at each of the three stations <br />by scraping rocks from one square foot of cobble substrate and pre- <br />serving the contents in a 90% acetone solution. Three replicates were <br />taken at each station and the samples were analyzed by the Utah Water <br />Research Laboratory at Utah State University for chlorophyll a content. <br />Aquatic macrophytes were visually noted during the sampling trips. <br />Taxa present and their relative abundance were recorded. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.