Laserfiche WebLink
<br />38 <br /> <br />J <br />I <br />I <br />, <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Probably the greatest potential impact is the indirect effect of <br />withdrawing water from the Green River system. The 30 cfs proposed for <br />withdrawal should not be a noticeable quantity, even during low flow <br />periods, by itself. But the cumulative impact of a number of small <br />withdrawals could pose serious problems. As mentioned above, and <br />presented by Holden (1977), Colorado squawfish reproductive success <br />in the Green River was very poor in 1977. The major factor hypothesized <br />to account for this phenomenon is the reduced flows of the Yampa and <br />White rivers due to a drought that year. This suggests very strongly <br />that Colorado squawfish have a minimum flow requirement below which <br />reproductive success is very poor. The actual causative agent, such <br />as water volume, water velocity, available habitat, or altered temper- <br />ature regime, is not known. Holden (1977) hypothesized that altered <br />habitat may have been the problem, and noted that daily fluctuations <br />due to releases from Flaming Gorge Dam were quite large (.5 m) near <br />Jensen. Fluctuations in late 1979 were not nearly the size of those <br />in 1977, averaging only about 0.2 m. Fewer backwaters that did not <br />change daily due to river level were available in 1977 than 1979. <br />Therefore, if flows are reduced in the Green River beyond a point <br />that is as yet undetermined, the best remaining naturally reproducing <br />population of Colorado squawfish could be seriously impacted. It should <br />be stressed again that this impact could be caused by the cumulative <br />effect of a number of small withdrawals from the Green River and its <br />tributaries, of which the subject withdrawal is only one. <br />