Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Although the main objective of defining spawning requirements of Colorado <br />squawfish was far from accomplished, it must be admitted that the succ~ssful <br />tracking for six weeks of one radio tagged fish shows the methodology holds great <br />promise. Also, the reason for failure was apparently faulty equipment, rather <br />than problems associated either with the effect of the methodology on the fish <br />or the physical characteristics of the Green River itself. Therefore, it is rec- <br />ommended that another attempt be supported to locate Colorado squawfish spawning <br />sites using radio telemetry. The following sequence should be followed. <br />1. A thorough preview of radio transmitters should be made utilizing <br />both the manufacturers' claims for their equipment and contacts <br />with researchers who have actually used the equipment in the field. <br />The manufacturers with transmitters showing the greatest depend- <br />ability and strength of signal would then be asked to supply <br />equipment for a field evaluation of at least one month in dura- <br />tion. It would be highly desirable to obtain transmitters com- <br />patible with the present RF-40 and SR-40 receivers, as they <br />appear to functi on well wi th good transmitters. The' equipment <br />should then be thoroughly tested in the Green River for strength <br />of signal at various depths and in water of various conductivi- <br />ties. The tags could then be evaluated on their applicability <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />24 <br /> <br />. <br />