My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7025
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:44 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:45:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7025
Author
Hawkins, J. A. and T. P. Nesler.
Title
Nonnative Fishes in the Upper Colorado River Basin
USFW Year
1991.
USFW - Doc Type
An Issue Paper.
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />1 ' <br />1 <br /> <br />54 <br /> <br />which nonnative species affect which endangered species and how. Recommendations 7- <br />10 provide further guidance regarding research activities that would document negative <br />impacts to recruitment, negative competitive interactions, and the utility of flow-related <br />management, habitat enhancement, or fish control efforts in reducing the abundance and <br />effects of introduced fishes or enhancing the survival of native fishes. Recommendations <br />11-12 encourage better research planning and design based on previous research results. <br /> <br />Currently, research is ongoing that addresses some of the concerns and <br />recommendations above. Results from these studies will provide further guidance of a <br />more specific nature regarding problem species, interactions with native fishes, and <br />effects of environmental manipulations. Decisions concerning future research needs or <br />field management activities can be refined when these studies are completed. <br /> <br />" <br />f, <br />t <br /> <br />Until research documentation provides the necessary direction, specific <br />management activities targeted at negatively affecting introduced fish species should be <br />selected carefully. Negative management activities directed at introduced fish species <br />with little sportfish value can probably proceed without arousing opposition. In the <br />meantime, agencies can seek to minimize suspected negative impacts from nonnative <br />fishes by more conservative management of certain predaceous gamefish species in <br />select, or restricted aquatic habitat. This is the essence of management recommendations <br />1-2. Agencies can also manage for identifying and ~educing incidental harvest of <br />endangered and native fishes via angling by continuing to monitor river reaches via creel <br />survey, protecting endangered fishes and select river reaches vulnerable to angling <br />pressure, and continuing public relations and education efforts aimed at promoting <br />identification and release of endangered and native fishes. This is the intent of <br />management recommendations 3-5. <br /> <br />Recommendations 6-8 suggest means of improving management for nongame and <br />native fish fauna via better communication between nongame and gamefish interests, <br />review of present stocking programs and goals, and expanded regulatory procedures for <br />preventing undesirable introductions of non-native fish species. Reintroduction or <br />augmentation of native endangered fishes are potential management options applicable <br />in the field. Research results have suggested this approach can be severely affected by <br />the presence of predaceous fish species in the receiving waters. Recommendation 9 <br />suggests a protocol and procedure for reintroduction or augmentation in riverine habitat <br />affected by introduced predaceous fishes. <br /> <br />( <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.