Laserfiche WebLink
<br />53 <br /> <br />8.) Agencies should seek to establish regulatory review procedures regarding stocking of <br />private waters and baitfish commerce to prevent undesirable introductions of nonnative <br />fish species. <br /> <br />9) Endangered fish that are stocked should be large enough to avoid predation by most <br />fishes. Minimum size should be determined by existing predator conditions and sizes. <br />Predator free grow-out ponds should be used to obtain fish of suitable size. <br /> <br />10) Establish river reaches or entire rivers as natural preserves. Attempt to maintain <br />these as refugia by providing historic flows and if possible exclusion of exotic fishes. <br /> <br />Implementation strategy <br /> <br />One of the objectives of this issue paper was to provide the Recovery <br />Implementation Program (RIP) with guidance on how to approach the issue of nonnative <br />fish impacts upon the recovery of endangered native fishes. A primary result indicated <br />that documented evidence was severely lacking on the impacts and control of nonnative <br />fishes. Given the 15 yr time frame set for the RIP, we are faced with two alternatives to <br />proceed: <br /> <br />1) Accept the conceptual understanding that negative impacts of introduced fishes in the <br />Colorado River Basin are significant without scientific documentation and proceed to <br />negatively manage populations of introduced fish species perceived to be most harmful to <br />the native fish fauna, or ' <br /> <br />2) Target research on introduced fish species perceived to be harmful and identify which <br />life stages and in which habitats introduced species negatively affect endangered fishes; <br />then manage toward reducing or eliminating the negative effect. <br /> <br />The choices, however, are not as simple as selecting (1) or (2). Inherent within <br />both alternatives is a subsequent decision as to whether management alternatives and <br />field techniques exist, or can be developed, to reduce or eliminate the negative <br />interaction. Most of the introduced fishes exist in the Colorado River Basin due to some <br />human-related activity. Some of the nonnative species represent popular gamefish <br />species; some represent selected species for management of forage bases for sport <br />fisheries or common commercial bait products. In conjunction with conservation of the <br />wildlife resource, an important mandate for state wildlife agencies is to provide public <br />fishing recreation. Similar to water and land management activities, correction of <br />perceived negative impacts from introduced fishes will undoubtedly restrict or eliminate <br />certain human activities and choices, and will require documentation in order to proceed. <br /> <br />Recommendations provided here comprise a strategy for approaching the issue of <br />introduced fish impacts. Recommendations 1-6 for research attempt to direct this activity <br />toward areas of major concern in a logical sequence. These activities start to answer <br />