My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7025
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:44 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:45:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7025
Author
Hawkins, J. A. and T. P. Nesler.
Title
Nonnative Fishes in the Upper Colorado River Basin
USFW Year
1991.
USFW - Doc Type
An Issue Paper.
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />42 <br /> <br />Habitat management <br /> <br />-Habitat improvement favoring maintenance of native species populations. <br />-Expand habitat availability through passage and increased access to available habitat <br />-Implement water management strategies to reduce the success of some introduced species <br />and increase the success of native species. <br />-Flow alteration (spring peaks, more natural hydrograph) to benefit natives, hinder <br />nonnatives. <br />-Habitat management with flows. <br />-Provide more favorable flow regimes and habitat <br />-Manage for pristine habitat conditions. <br />-Provide best habitat conditions through maintenance of natural flow regime to benefit <br />native fishes versus nonnative fishes. <br />-Site specific flow and habitat management practices that promote natives and eliminate or <br />reduce nonnatives. <br />-Determine flows that benefit native species over nonnatives. <br />-Flow regimes from major dams need to give every advantage to native fishes. <br />-Return the system to a natural flow regime. <br />-Management activities (including management of flows to increase the magnitude and <br />frequency of high spring flows, and increase availability of optimal spawning habitat <br />like flooded lowlands for razorback sucker) to enhance reproductive success of <br />endangered fish maybe the best strategy in lieu of a means to eliminate introduced <br />fish. <br />-Creation of artificial habitats/channels where success (abundance and reproduction) of <br />target species can be monitored. <br />-Water rights acquisition. <br />-Better water conservation. <br /> <br />Several respondents reiterated the opinion that better flow and habitat management would <br />reduce the relative impact of nonnative species by creating an environment more favorable <br />to the survival capabilities of native species. <br /> <br />Control of nonnative fishes <br /> <br />-Periodic and perpetual removal of nonnatives by some means yet undiscovered <br />-Periodic electrofishing to remove introduced species limited to habitats of small size. <br />-Provide nonnative fish control during spawning and rearing in select habitats. <br />-Intense assistance during reproductive period for razorback sucker. <br />-Identify problematic species first, then determine if it is possible to control them. <br />-Target key habitats used by introduced species as refugia. <br />-Selective renovation or harvest in stream reaches known to concentrate nonnatives (below <br />diversions, for example). <br />-Increase harvest (sport and commercial) of nonnatives. <br />-Stop further stocking of nonnatives (present and new species). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.