My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7025
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:44 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:45:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7025
Author
Hawkins, J. A. and T. P. Nesler.
Title
Nonnative Fishes in the Upper Colorado River Basin
USFW Year
1991.
USFW - Doc Type
An Issue Paper.
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />32 <br /> <br />Question 9: In your opinion, what are possible field techniques or other approaches that <br />wildlife management agencies might use to lessen, or eliminate problems or <br />impacts created by introduced species? <br /> <br />Five respondents suggested a philosophical assessment was in order prior to any <br />discussion of active negative management of problematic introduced species. These are <br />paraphrased below: <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />Honestly assess relative values. If native fish are valued higher, explore means to <br />remove nonnatives and prevent re-establishment This is very difficult and costly, <br />however. <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />Assess whether introduced species are the primary or secondary cause qf the impacts. <br />Attempt removal of nonnatives only if they are the primary cause. <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />We must identify problems first and attempt to target vulnerable life stages (of <br />nonnatives ). <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />The real question ought to be: "Can we restore the habitats in the Green and <br />Colorado rivers to their original conditions, which would favor the needs of endemic <br />fishes?" The answer is obviously no, due to the dams! A further issue, assuming <br />interspecific competition from exotic fishes, is how to maintain or reduce the exotic <br />population numbers?" <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />We may be able to more effectively manage for endemics and against introduced <br />fishes. <br /> <br />- <br />Five respondents provided a philosophical perspective based on what they perceived <br />as the reality of problems posed by introduced species. Several indicated no practical, <br />realistic, or effective solutions existed for eliminating or solving these problems. Two other <br />responses suggested these problems are permanent and recovery efforts or management <br />should be targeted at determining the extent of the impacts and the efficacy of control <br />measures. <br /> <br />Remaining responses offered approaches which could be grouped into five major <br />categories. These were sport fishery regulation, sportfish stocking, eradication, habitat <br />management, and hatchery augmentation. In almost all cases, these approaches were not <br />offered as singular techniques, but as elements of a comprehensive approach using multiple <br />techniques from one or more categories. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.