Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />STUDY AREA <br /> <br />The Little Snake River is located primarily in northwestern Colorado, but <br />much of the watershed is in southwestern Wyoming (Figure 1). The river drains <br />two very different physiographic regions, the Southern Rocky Mountains and the <br />arid Wyoming Basin (Hunt 1 974) . Total drainage area is 9,700 km2 and mean <br />annual runoff is 412,400 acre-feet/year (Ugland et al. 1995). Discharge is both <br />seasonal and extreme. For example, mean-monthly discharge is 40 m3/sec in May, <br />but base flows regularly approach zero between July and November (Ugland et al. <br />1995). Highest measured peak flow was 473 m3/sec on May 18, 1984 (Ugland et <br />aJ. 1995). <br /> <br />Most of the warm-water habitat in the Little Snake River occurs in Colorado. <br />Within Colorado we identified three different reaches, each with unique <br />geomorphological characteristics. These characteristics included the local <br />topography and geology, river gradient, and predominant substrate. Locations <br />were identified from U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) topographic maps of Moffat <br />County (1 :50,000 scale). Specific locations on the river were identified on the <br />map by delineating river kilometers (RK) starting at the confluence with the Yampa <br />River. An upper reach from RK 160 to RK 80 contained gravel and cobble <br />substrates and riffle-pool habitats that maintained highly diverse fish habitats at all <br />flow levels. At runoff; riffles, pools, and eddies were abundant in this reach and at <br />baseflow large refugia pools were common. A middle reach between RK 80 and <br />RK 15 was located in a broad, unconfined riverbed with low gradient and <br />predominately sand substrate. Habitat diversity in this reach was low at all water <br />levels. During runoff, most of the habitat in this reach was homogeneous run with <br />a few eddies that provided some velocity refuge for fish. During baseflow, much <br />of the habitat in this reach was marginal because flow dispersed through the broad <br />sand bed providing little refugia for large fishes. The riverbed in the lower reach <br />(RK 15 to RK 5) was confined by a canyon that not only constricted the river <br /> <br />3 <br />