Laserfiche WebLink
<br />,.: <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />along the upper Green River (personal obselVation). Other flows over the last several decades have <br />not produced cottonwoods. Second, how much of an effect will encroachment of vegetation into the <br />river channel have on reconfiguration of the channel, if peak flows are reinstated? Studies are <br />needed to quantify this very apparent relationship between reduction of peak flow events and <br />changes within the riparia of the Upper Colorado River Basin. <br /> <br />.Loss of Food Web Function in the Varial Zone: The Problem of Basejlow Instability <br />Hydropower operations have produced erratic baseflows on the Gunnison (e.g., Figure 11) <br />and on the Green River (e.g., Figure 10) that are especially problematic because they destabilize <br />food webs in the "varial zone" of the river. The varial zone is the shallow area of the shoreline (as <br />opposed to the middle or thalweg of the channel) that is inundated and dewatered by the g flow <br />events. Hence, the varial zone includes riparia as well as portions of the primary and secondary <br />channels and backwaters not normally considered part of the riparian zone. In an unregulated river <br />the varial zone may be quite large and dynamic in the context of natural geomorphic variability <br />described by Figure 2, or in the context of the gallery forest discussed above. The varial zone in a <br />regulated river often is smaller, owing to reduction in peak flows; but, more importantly, the varial <br />zone of a regulated river usually is repeatedly watered and dewatered by dam operations for <br />hydropower generation. As markets for hydropower vary, so does water output from the dam. <br />The result on the Green and Gunnison Rivers is reflected in high spikes above baseflow (e.g., at <br />points of initiation shown by arrows in Figure II) often lasting several days (e.g., note also sudden <br />changes in flow in Figure 10). The extreme nature of these flow changes are more evident when <br />hourly flows are plotted for the same periods (Figures 12 and 13). Regulated flows below <br />hydropower dams also often reflect the consequences of the dam operator's need to control <br />electrical load ("peaking" operations), as on the Green River in 1992 (i.e., diel cycles evident in <br />Figures 12 and 13). Peaking and other short-term operations water and dewater the varial zone of a <br />regulated river with much greater frequency than would occur under natural conditions. Stanford <br />and Hauer (1992) demonstrated that diel changes on the Middle Fork of the Flathead River, an <br /> <br />34 <br />