My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9327
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9327
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:34 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:34:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9327
Author
Starnes, W. C.
USFW Year
1995.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
150
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
between the upper Rio Grande proper and Pecos samples occur at <br />the EST-2 and GPI-1 loci (Figs. 6,7) but the extremely small <br />Pecos sample renders this highly inconclusive. DeMarais (1992) <br />did not examine EST-2 but found two alleles in samples from the <br />two subbasins at "GPI-A" which occurred at similar frequencies <br />throughout; thus differences at GPI-1 herein, which had but a <br />single allele in the Pecos sample, might diminish with increased <br />sample size and/or the addition of samples from other populations <br />within these subbasins. <br />Taxonomic Implications <br />Gila forms from the Guzman and Rio Grande-Pecos basins have <br />been variously considered to represent a single taxon, G. <br />nigrescens (Girard, 1856)(e.g., Koster, 1957; Bailey et al., <br />1970) or populations from the Rio Grande-Pecos have been <br />considered a separate taxon, G. pandora (Cope, 1872) as suspected <br />by Miller (1945)(e.g., Smith and Miller, 1986; Sublette et al., <br />1990; Robins et al., 1991; DeMarais, 1992; Starnes, in press). <br />Allelic differences noted above, mainly supplemented by the <br />findings of DeMarais (1992), provide further justification for <br />recognition of both taxa. Moreover, possible differences among <br />populations within those basins bear further investigation, <br />particularly with regard to the EST-2 locus. <br />It is particularly noteworthy that there were no fixed <br />differences between the Guzman Basin sample (G. nigrescens) and <br />samples from the Gila Basin at any of the loci examined whereas, <br />if differences at the GPI-1 and PK-1 loci withstand further <br />scrutiny, such a distinction may exist between the Guzman and Rio <br />Grande basin (G. pandora) populations. <br />Colorado River Basin <br />Genotypic variation within Colorado Basin Gila has regional <br />characteristics. Discussion of these characteristics is <br />therefore compartmentalized on a regional basis preceded by an <br />overview on inter- and intrabasin variation. For purposes of <br />discussion the Colorado Basin is divided into three regions, <br />following, in part, the convention of Minckley et al. (1986). <br />The Lower Basin consists of the Gila and Bill Williams river <br />systems and lower mainstem of the Colorado River below the Bill <br />Williams confluence (Fig. 1). The Middle Basin includes the <br />mainstem Colorado from Lake Mohave upstream to Glen Canyon Dam <br />near the Axizona-Utah border, and tributaries of that region, the <br />Virgin, Moapa, and Pluvial White systems and the Little Colorado <br />River. The Upper Basin comprises the Colorado River and all <br />tributaries, including the San Juan and Green river systems, from <br />Lake Powell upstream. <br />Taken collectively, samples of Gila taxa from the Colorado <br />Basin exhibit genotypic distinctness from those taken from basins <br />8
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.