Laserfiche WebLink
The aforementioned genetically delimited group of samples in <br />the Culiacan, Sinaloa, Fuerte, Mayo, and portions of the Yaqui <br />drainage corresponds morphologically to fishes in Yaqui drainage <br />populations treated as "Gila robusta by Hendrickson et al. <br />(1980). They map the distribution, based on about 30 collections <br />examined, as occurring throughout most of the drainage in larger <br />streams or smaller tributaries with large permanent pools. Meek <br />(1902) described a taxon, Gila minacae, from Minaca on the upper <br />Rio Papigochic, Chihuahua, that is probably based on this form as <br />judged from his description, a subsequently published <br />illustration (Meek, 1904), and his recognition that it differed <br />from a sympatric form in that area, next discussed. Hendrickson <br />et al. (1980) placed minacae in the synonomy of G. robusta Baird <br />and Girard, 1853, described from the Colorado Basin, but genetic <br />evidence presented here strongly suggest that different taxa are <br />involved. Pending examination of the type (Field Museum Natural <br />History 3573), the nominal minacae Meek, 1902 may be the <br />appropriate epithet applicable to Gila populations examined <br />herein from the Culiacan drainage northward through the Mayo and <br />to many populations in the Yaqui drainage with the exception of <br />the following. <br />Specimens in the La Junta and Los Gavilones samples were <br />field identified by M.E. Douglas as "pulchra-like". Hendrickson <br />et al. (1980) report the occurrence of G. pulchra (as earlier <br />regarded by Meek, 1902,1904) at several localities in smaller <br />tributaries of the upper Papigochic system and note that is also <br />known from such habitats in the upper Mayo and Fuerte drainages <br />which are not populations sampled herein. Gila pulchra (Girard, <br />1857) was described from the Rio Conchos basin to the east of the <br />Yaqui, which is tributary to the Rio Grande and Gulf of Mexico; <br />Smith and Miller (1986) and Minckley et al. (1986) regard it as <br />endemic thereto and Yaqui populations as an undescribed taxon. <br />The allelic differences described above corroborate the <br />occurrence of broadly sympatric but wholly or partially <br />reproductively isolated forms in the eastern Yaqui drainage which <br />probably correspond in part to the,nominal menacae and pulchra or <br />the "pulchra-like" form (hereafter cf. pulchra). Unfortunately, <br />samples of pulchra from the Rio Conchos basin are not available <br />for comparison of alleles between that taxon and the Yaqui form. <br />Moreover, allelic differences between the La Junta and Los <br />Gavilones cf. pulchra samples from the upper Papigochic raise <br />questions as to whether a third taxon exists in the drainage or <br />if one may be a product of hybridization. The sharing of alleles <br />at two loci (bGAL,MPI-2) by the Los Gavilones sample but not the <br />La Junta sample with samples here referred to menacae may <br />indicate that the former is genotypically a product of past <br />introgression. However the Los Gavilones sample appears to be in <br />Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (Table 4, Appendix) and therefore <br />hybridization may not be recent. <br />As noted previously, UPGMA grouped cf. pulchra samples from <br />5