My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9327
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9327
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:34 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:34:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9327
Author
Starnes, W. C.
USFW Year
1995.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
150
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
population. However, DeMarais (1992) examined a sample of 14 <br />from this population and found results at AK-1 and and possibly <br />IDHP-2 consistent with those herein; he did not examine EST-2 or <br />PK-1 nor samples from Mexican populations. <br />All samples from the Culiacan, Sinaloa, Fuerte, and Mayo <br />drainages appear to conform to Hardy-Weinberg expectations at all <br />polymorphic loci (Appendix, Table 6). The AK-1 locus has <br />possible occurrences of rare alleles and a deficiency of expected <br />heterozygotes in the Mayo sample resulting in a significant <br />deviation (P<.05) from expected values in the chi-square analysis <br />but not the exact probabilites analysis; the latter indicates it <br />may not deviate significantly from random possibilities. The San <br />Bernadino sample is two small (n=4) for meaningful tests of <br />conformance; DeMarais (1992) reported four polymorphic loci in <br />his sample of 14 from this population but did not report results <br />of Hardy-Weinberg tests. <br />Genetic variability (Appendix, Table 5) in several samples <br />from Mexican Pacific drainages is relatively low, including the <br />combined Culiacan-Sinaloa-Fuerte sample (mean heterozygosity <br />.029), and Mayo (.017), lower Yaqui (.000), Tomochic (.006) and <br />Mdtape (.007) samples as compared to the mean calculated for <br />fishes in general (.051, Nevo et al., 1984) or that calculated <br />for several species of North American cyprinids (0.038 ± .008, <br />Avise, 1977) with only the first approaching that level. <br />Heterozygosities were not computed separately for the three <br />component samples combined in the CUL+ sample but examination of <br />scores clearly indicates that this attribute was increased by <br />this combination through cumulative diversity of heterozygotes at <br />GPI-1 and bGAL, though GPI-1 was totally homozygous in the SIN <br />sample and bGAL was so in the FUE sample. However, even taken <br />singly, these component samples exceeded the number of observed <br />heterozygotes in the Mayo sample and the others. <br />Echelle (1991) has discussed the relatively low variability <br />found in desert dwelling fishes, several having heterozygosties <br />in the range reported above for Gila, and hypothesized that <br />repeated bottlenecking (sensu Motro and Thomson, 1982) and <br />relative isolation are responsible for this characteristic. The <br />hydrographic histories of the respective Gila sampling sites are <br />not well enough known to corroborate or cast doubt on the <br />applicability of such a theory to Mexican populations. However, <br />populations in such large rivers as the Yaqui questionably would <br />be subjected to such phenomena. It should be noted that samples <br />from the upper Papigochic (JUN and GAV) and the San Bernadino <br />sample (though small), from relatively small habitats, exhibited <br />much higher heterozygosties (.040 - .071) than the above samples. <br />Taxonomic Implications <br />4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.