Laserfiche WebLink
hypothesis. Connell suggested that biodiversity is maximized by ecosystems that are <br />"adapted" to disturbance events of intermediate intensity and duration. Intermediate <br />might be loosely quantified in catchment terms as less than a 100 year flood event and <br />more dynamic than constant flow, for example, from a spring or a storage reservoir. In <br />other words, it is intuitive that a most probable state of quasi-equilibrium can be <br />maintained by natural, intermediate disturbances until a major disturbance event on the <br />scale of a volcanic eruption or hurricane eventuates. Events of that magnitude can <br />completely restructure ecosystems. However, recovery is more rapid than once <br />thought (e.g., recovery of streams following the 1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens in <br />the Cascade Range, USA, is occurring decades sooner than expected). <br />In many ways the idea of natural disturbance controls on stream ecosystem <br />structure and function, however intuitive, remains hypothetical for lack of long-term data <br />sets to test inferences. Indeed, the National Science Foundation decided nearly a <br />decade ago to support long-term ecological research (LTER) at a variety of sites in <br />different biomes so that accurate data describing interannual variation and ecosystem <br />responses to environmental change could be evaluated quantitatively. The objective <br />was to initiate work on hypotheses requiring data sets of five years or more and at the <br />same time setting up a network of sites where basic biophysical data would be <br />systematically gathered for decades (Likens 1989, Franklin et al. 1990). These studies <br />have already greatly contributed to understanding ecosystem connectivity, although <br />data are not yet of sufficient scope to resolve many of the landscape- and patch- <br />specific hypotheses proposed in the LTER program (Swanson and Sparks 1990). <br />Moreover, these data are very site specific and tied to falsefication of hypotheses that <br />are clearly of great scientific importantance but may also be rather narrow in scope <br />from the point of view of many managers. <br />Even though the scientific community has a long way to go before ecosystem <br />response to natural environmental changes is fully understood, frequency, intensity <br />and duration of human disturbances of catchments are often more extreme than <br />natural events. In case after case, ecosystems in the catchment sense presented <br />herein have been essentially uncoupled by the cummulative impacts and interactions <br />of human disturbances (Table 1) (see also Ward and Stanford 1989). Perhaps the <br />most pervasive disturbance is encompassed by the combined effects of channelization, <br />revetment and harvest of riparian timber within major river corridors. It has often. been <br />written that we may never know the true nature of channel-floodplain connectivity of <br />large (> 8th order) rivers in the temperate latitudes because cultural development of the <br />industrial nations was so dependent on these rivers as commercial waterways and <br />9