Laserfiche WebLink
operations at both dams (Fraley et al. 1989, Fraley and DosSantos 1991, Jourdonnais <br />et al. 1990, Stanford in press). <br />Differences of opinion remain as to whether the various mitigation actions are <br />appropriate or whether they will work explicitly as proposed, primarily because the <br />statutory authorities of the two processes are independent and mandate solution of <br />impacts on fish and wildlife without in-depth consideration of the other ecosystem <br />interactions, such as influences on timing and magnitude of nutrient loads and <br />connectivity between riverine processes and food web dynamics (Stanford in press). <br />However, the pervasive effects of stream and lake regulation were thoroughly <br />documented and an interagency consultation and public information transfer was <br />effective. This was fostered by forums coordinated by a public information and <br />oversight group called the Flathead Basin Commission. This commission was <br />legislated by the State to bring together agency heads and informed citizens in a <br />manner that stimulated interagency cooperation to fund research, effectively monitoring <br />of ecosystem indicators (e.g., catchment-wide water quality and population dynamics of <br />important indicator organisms, like the bull charr) and facilitate interactive discussion of <br />results and proposed management actions in a non-statutory fashion. <br />The natural ecological connectivity of the Flathead catchment remains largely <br />intact. It is a high priority area for conservation and effective resource management <br />since large areas are designated as national parks, wildlife refuges, wilderness areas <br />and Tribal lands. Environmental problems exist but they have been quantified, <br />articulated and periodically reassessed in the process of understanding how this large <br />catchment is influenced by natural and human disturbances. More information is <br />needed, but the presence of a legislated commission to coordinate monitoring of <br />ecosystem conditions by the many different management agencies has proven to be an <br />effective and empirically-based forum for considering and implementing alternative <br />actions to protect and enhance ecological connectivity in this large catchment. <br />Interference Management and the Illusion of Technique <br />The Flathead experience illustrates the travail of contemporary resource <br />management. Interactive and cumulative effects become seemingly intractable in <br />large and ecologically complex catchments. Managers often want cookbook <br />methodology that will explicitly satisfy increasingly circumspect publics. Unfortunately, <br />in the absence of practical and conceptual understanding of ecosystem structure and <br />function, management actions often produce results significantly different from what <br />19