My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9383
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9383
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:35 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 12:59:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9383
Author
SWCA, I.
Title
Recovery Goals for the four Colorado River Endangered Fish Species.
USFW Year
2000.
USFW - Doc Type
Logan.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />(I <br /> <br />1997), bald eagles, peregrine falcons, desert tortoise (Berry 1999), Pacific salmon (Allendorf et <br />a 19 , and southern sea otters (Ralls et al. 1996). <br />urthermore, recovery is based on removal of threats and improvement of the status of <br />the species during the period in which it is listed, and not just from the time a listed species is <br />proposed for reclassification. Hence, while dams were considered a major threat to the four <br />endangered fishes of the Colorado River, construction of new dams in prime habitat ceased <br />nearly 4 decades ago. The ongoing threat is not new dam construction but the effects linked to <br />the operation of th s, such as river regulation, cold water releases, and removal of <br />sediment and org tter, as well as introduction of nonnative fish species. <br />Two major stan ards must be met before achieving recovery of an endangered species. <br />. <br /> <br />The first is the determination and quantification of the population at the level of "endangered", <br />which is defined in the ESA (Section 3 [6] and 3 [20]) as "...a species which is likely to become <br />extinct throughout all or a significant portion of its historic range." The second is the <br />determination and quantification of the population at the level of "threatened", which is defined <br />in the ESA as "...a species which is likel become an endangered species within the <br />foreseeable future. " <br />To determine the level at which a species is "endangered", the standard suggested by <br />Mace and Lande (1991) is used, in which a vertebrate population with an effective population <br />size (Ne) of <500, that may be subject to catastrophic population crashes, should be considered in <br />danger of extinction and therefore, endangered. A species is in danger of extinction when any of <br />the following considerations and conditions is met: <br />. Genetics: when numbers of individuals are to to maintain genetic variability <br />and to counter the effects of deleterious gene mutations from inbreeding. <br />. Demographics: when numbers of individuals are too low so that when deaths <br />exceed births and recruitment for periods of time, the population moves toward <br />low genetic viability and extinction. <br />. Population Redundancy: when populations are too few, or too concentrated, to <br />avert catastrophies from singular threats. <br />. Threats: when threats persist such that a significant portion of the po tion can <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.