Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />Ii <br /> <br />to develop and implement species recovery plans "...for the conservation and survival... " of <br />cies. The ESA states that "The terms 'conserve', 'conserving', and 'conservation' <br />use and the use of all methods and procedures which are necessary to bring any <br />endangered species or threatened species to the point at which the measures provided pursuant <br />to this Act are no longer necessary." The Service further defines conservation as <br />"... improvement in the status of a listed species to the point at which listing is no longer <br />appropriate..." (50 CFR S402.02). These definitions demonstrate the strong relationship <br />between the delist' 'teria used for recovery and the five factors that determine whether any <br />'qlt species or a threatened species under Section 4(a) of the ESA. The five <br />listing factors are a re~ed in Section 3.0 of this report, and are: <br />A. The present or threatened destruction, modification, or curtailment of its habitat or <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />range, <br />B. Overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or educational purposes, <br />C. Disease or predation, <br />D. The inadequacy of existi gulatory mechanisms, or <br />E. Other natural or manm e Qrs affecting its continued existence. <br />Recovery implements management actions that minimize or remove threats and allow <br />genetically and demographically viable, self-sustaining populations to thrive under minimal <br />ongoing management. Recovery does not mandate returning animals to all or a significant <br />portion of their historic range, nor does recovery mandate establishing populations in all possible <br />habitats, or everywhere the species can be established or re- . hed. Removing a species <br />from protection of the ESA remands the primary responsibili management of that species <br />back to the states, who may choose to further expand the range. and populations of that species. <br />While the goal of returning endangered species to all potential habitats may be desirable, the <br />intent of the ESA is to establish viable, self-sustaining populations. The standard of establishing <br />and protecting viable, self-sustaining populations, as applied to the recovery of all listed species, <br />is used as the standard in developing recovery criteria for the four endangered fishes of the <br />Colorado River Basin. This approach is consistent with recovery of other vertebrat~es, <br />such as grizzly bears (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1993, U.S. Department of Agri~ture <br /> <br />3 <br />