Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />33 <br /> <br />than a specific length; nonetheless, the change in the slope <br />of the curve in this threshold area may be quite sharp. <br />Several studies have demonstrated that age-O largemouth bass <br />that grow large enough to feed on fish grow more quickly <br />than those that are too small and must feed on invertebrate <br />foods (Aggus and Elliott 1975; Davies et ale 1982; Gutreuter <br />and Anderson 1985). Fast-growing members of an age-O cohort <br />that make the early transition to piscivory become the <br />recruitment class for the population (Gutreuter and Anderson <br />1985). Perhaps once Colorado squawfish exceed this <br />threshold length, their time to starvation becomes <br />effectively infinite. <br />The overwinter survival hypotheses represented by A, C, <br />and D in Figure 5 could be tested in field studies. The <br />curves presented in Figure 5 provide a range of possible <br />length-overwinter survival scenarios that may be occurring <br />in the wild. I believe the most likely relationship between <br />fish size and overwinter survival operating in wild <br />populations is curve D. <br />The actual shape and location of the length versus <br />overwinter survival relationship for age-O Colorado <br />squawfish probably varies with the latitude in which each <br />particular fish population occurs. Age-O fish in the <br />comparatively warmer Green and Lower Colorado Rivers are <br />generally larger than age-O fish in the Upper Colorado <br />River. Thus, Green and Lower Colorado River fish may <br />