My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7742
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7742
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:30 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 12:55:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7742
Author
Gilpin, M.
Title
A Population Viability Analysis of the Colorado Squawfish in the Upper Colorado River Basin
USFW Year
1993.
USFW - Doc Type
A Report to the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Denver, Colorado.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Squawfish Population Viability Analysis --July 1993 <br /> <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />From such a mathematical description, one first obtains the discrete growth <br />rate (A), and thereafter one can do sensitivity analysis and make structural <br />modifications. For species such as the grizzly bear and the desert tortoise, <br />such a life historical representation is the foundation of the PV A. For a <br />whole list of reasons, life historical data are extremely difficult to obtain <br />for the Colorado squawfish. What follows, however, is an attempt to <br />obtain a best approximation to squawfish demography. <br /> <br />1.2 Age or Size? <br /> <br />Species with indeterminate growth are often treated with size-based models <br />rather than age-based models. However, Caswell's (1989) recent book on <br />matrix population methods shows that the two approaches are quite similar. <br />For the Colorado squawfish, it seems that size and age are closely <br />correlated for the pre-reproductive period of life. After this, there are <br />some problems. Nonetheless, one can hope that the two might be used <br />interchangeably in future work. Since age-based demography is <br />mathematically more tractable, and is better discussed in the literature, the <br />discussion to follow will be based on age. <br /> <br />1.3 What's Initially Left Out: Density, Time & Space <br /> <br />Typically, demographic analyses makes many simplifying assumptions <br />about the population. The entire river basin is assumed homogeneous; <br />thus, spatial position does not matter--the fish are the same everywhere. <br />The fraction of the fish in each age (or size) class is assumed to remain <br />constant with time; that is, the size distribution is stable. The discrete <br />growth rate, denoted A (lambda), on an arbitrary time scale, e.g., per year, <br />is a constant. The basic dynamic is Nt+l = ANt. Sometimes, A is simply <br />assumed to be 1.0. The total population size at which this constancy is <br />reached is irrelevant, though it is doubtless set by density-related, <br />ecological factors. There are no fluctuations about average values, and <br />there is, consequently, no possibility of population extinction. <br /> <br />Without a sense of this Ideal Demography, it is hard to incorporate <br />properly the effects of population density , ecology, stochastic <br />enviro~ental variation and spatial structure to the limit of patchiness. <br /> <br />1.4 Time Scales <br /> <br />Population dynamics have intrinsic time scales that are largely governed by <br />the demography of the individuals of the species. The generation time is a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.