Laserfiche WebLink
<br />FinaJ.l.y the Supreme Court called a halt to Arizona's eight years of <br /> <br />shenanigans, but did not turn a deaf ear to the state's pleas. As a result <br />CaJ.ifornia was required to pq a fee on all water diverted. out of the <br />basin. In addition, CaJifornia I s vater and power allocations from the <br />federal pro ject were reduced, so that other basin states had a reserve <br /> <br />for future growth. <br /> <br />California did, however, go on to build Parker Dam on the Colorado <br />below Hoover Dam with state funds. Though CaJifornia was still required <br />to ~ a fee for water export, DO oDe could argue with the state's right <br />to control the water in the reservoir behinfl Parker as well as the elec- <br />tricity generated by the dam. (3,5) <br /> <br />Recent History <br /> <br />The states in the Lower Basin never have come to an agreement on water <br /> <br />allocation from the Colorado. Consequently, battles over water rights <br />and developnent still rage in courts and Congress, especially those <br /> <br />between Arizona and CaJifornia. The most recent dispute was over the <br /> <br />Central Arizona Project, which California successfully held up until <br /> <br />1968, more than 20 years. <br /> <br />The Upper Basin did finally come to an agreement on individual <br />state's water allowances..in 1948, when they set up the Upper Colorado <br /> <br />River Commission. The Commission then investigated, ruled upon, and <br /> <br />facilitated proposed developments in the Upper Colorado River. No <br />significant projects had taken place up until that time. (6) <br /> <br />-9- <br />