My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9653
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9653
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:37 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 12:55:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9653
Author
Gilbert, S.
Title
Powell's River, The Colorado - The Most Sought-after, Fought-over River in the History of North America.
USFW Year
1972.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />in 1911 and named after President Roosevelt, who signed the Reclamation <br /> <br />Act. <br /> <br />The Law of the River <br /> <br />The next big controversy to hit the waters of the Colorado was the pro- <br />posed construction of Hoover Dam and the All-American Canal to Los Angeles <br /> <br />and the Imperial Valley. Again Arizona was in the thick of the turmoil in <br /> <br />its attempts to prevent California from gaining exclusive control over the <br /> <br />water and power from the federally constructed dam. By this time, other <br /> <br />states in the Colorado Basin were beginning to catch onto the idea that <br />they bad better grab for a drop of the Colorado now if they were ever <br /> <br />going to use it. <br /> <br />Although the seven basin states could not agree on the specific <br />v <br />'tIater allocations, they did create the Colorado Ri. ver Compact of 1922, <br />'--- <br /> <br />deemed "The Law of the River". The compact divided the Colorado Basin <br />into two parts; the Upper and Lower Basins. (See map in frol'lt of paper). <br /> <br />The IDwer Basin was guaranteed a minimun flow of 7.5 million acre-feet of <br />water at Leels Ferry, while the Upper Basin was free to develop the <br /> <br />water in excess of that amount. Provision for a mi Tri mun flow to Mexico <br />was also included in the compact. (1,5) <br /> <br />With this agreement for a guaranteed flow, the construction of Hoover <br />Dam was allowed to progress. But Arizona was still not satisfied. <br /> <br />Although the compact had made the allocations between the Upper and <br />Lower Basins,it had made no specific allotment by state, and Arizona <br />thought it was being cheated out of its fair share in the future beneri ts <br /> <br />of the reclamation dam. The state even went so far as to patrol the dam <br /> <br />site with a small battleship to prevent construction. <br /> <br />-8- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.