Laserfiche WebLink
RELATIONSHII'S OF BIRDS, LIZARDS, AND NOCTURNAL RODENTS TO 'THEIR HABITAT IN TUCSON, ARIZONA <br />Wintering Birds. Variables generated for <br />winter bird:habitat analysis were the same as those <br />generated for breeding birds. I subjected <br />abundances of 8 ranked bird species and 15 habitat <br />variables to Gamma correlation analysis. I then <br />identified the relationship between each habitat <br />variable and the bird species it correlated with by <br />graphing mean bird species abundance against each <br />habitat variable. <br />Lizards. Variables describing the lizard <br />community at each plot were: abundance of each <br />species, species richness, and total abundance, <br />summed across all species. For each species at <br />each plot, the abundance value was calculated as <br />the mean of the 2 visits. <br />Ranked lizard species abundances and habitat <br />variables were subjected to Gamma correlation <br />analysis. I then plotted mean lizard species <br />abundance against classes of each habitat variable. <br />Since the lizard sample was smaller than the bird <br />sample, I chose a subset of 5 of the 15 habitat <br />variables used for the bird community analysis <br />and the 4 lizard species that met sample size <br />requirements. <br />I used correlation and forward stepwise <br />multiple regression analysis to develop 2 predictive <br />models associating species richness (all species <br />inclusive) and total abundance with the 5 habitat <br />variables. I treated outliers and diagnostics the <br />same as for breeding birds. The lizard data set <br />was not large enough to cross validate the model. <br />Wildlife Community Descriptors. I used <br />Spearman ranked correlation analyses to compare <br />the association of 3 parameters of the bird and <br />lizard communities across the urban gradient. <br />Species richness, total abundance, and (modified <br />Hill's [1973]) evenness ratio Fl, o; Alatalo 1981), for <br />the 5 bird groups (breeding native, non-native, <br />indicator guild, wintering native and non-native) <br />and for lizards were correlated with the habitat <br />variables that loaded into each group's predictive <br />model, and with a simple estimator of plot <br />heterogeneity. Habitat variables that loaded with <br />each breeding bird group were used for associated <br />wintering bird groups. Heterogeneity was the <br />number of major land cover types present at each <br />plot. <br />Nocturnal Rodents. I compared the abundance <br />of each species, species richness, and total <br />abundance between the treatments and controls in <br />a 2 x 2 contingency table using a 2-tailed Fisher's <br />exact test (Statsoft 1995). I also performed Post- <br />hoc tests via Chi-square subdivision to determine <br />if > 1 cell contained significantly different values <br />of any of the dependent variables (Zar 1984). <br />Where expected values in the subdivision test did <br />not meet the test sample size requirements, I <br />employed a Yates correction (Wilkinson 1990, <br />Statsoft 1995). The total abundance data set <br />contained large enough sample sizes to <br />approximate a normal Chi-square distribution, so <br />I tested changes in total abundance with the Chi- <br />square statistic instead of Fisher's exact test (Zar <br />1984). <br />1 <br />SZEPHEN S. GERMAINE 1995 <br />ARIZONA GAME fr FISH DEPARTMENT, TECH. REP. 20 11 <br />