My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9493
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9493
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 12:35:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9493
Author
Gaeuman, D., P. R. Wilcock and J. C. Schmidt.
Title
High Flow Requirements for Channel and Habitat Maintenance of the Lower Duchesne River between Randlett and Ouray, Utah.
USFW Year
2003.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
150
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />FINAL REPORT, November 2()03 <br />High-flow Requirements for the Duchesne River <br /> <br />matched the total energy head in the main channel at the chute's upstream junction. Downstream <br />boundary conditions for modeling higher discharge were derived by fitting a curve to stages <br />measured at the downstream cross section over the observed range of discharges. <br />Input data for the Green River backwater model consisted of an estimate for Manning's n <br />for the Duchesne River and a downstream boundary condition comprising a stage-discharge <br />relationship for the Green River at the mouth of the Duchesne River. Cross sections of the <br />Duchesne River were assigned Manning's n values of 0.025. The lack of rigorous calibration of <br />this model is justified on the grounds that it is intended to predict only the spatial extent of <br />backwater effects extending up the Duchesne River from the Green River. River stage within <br />this backwater zone is primarily a function of stage at the downstream boundary such that local <br />channel roughness has little or no effect on local hydraulic conditions. This model is not <br />intended to accurately predict flow velocity or depth, and has no validity beyond assessment of <br />the influence of the Green River backwater. A stage-discharge relationship was previously <br />developed for Old Charlie Wash I, a site on the Green River approximately 500 m upstream <br />from the mouth of the Duchesne, as part of the US Fish and Wildlife Recovery Program for <br />Endangered Fishes of the Upper Colorado River (FLO Engineering 1997). We adjusted the <br />datum used at Old Charlie Wash to better match the elevation at the mouth of the Duchesne <br />River, and this relationship was applied as a downstream boundary condition to our model. As <br />geographic data in our model were derived from the work of LC Headwaters, Inc., the water <br />surface elevation at the mouth of the Duchesne River reported by LC Headwaters was used for <br />datum adjustment. LC Headwaters reported a water surface elevation of 1,425.2 m at a time <br />when the Green River discharge was approximately 18,000 ft3/S. <br /> <br />Sediment Sampling <br />Two standard pebble counts were conducted on each of two riffles at each detail study <br />site. Surface layer size distributions produced from these data allowed determination of mean <br />gravel size for use in critical shear stress analysis at each site. Bulk subsurface bed material <br />samples were also collected from riffles exposed at low flow at each site according to the 2- <br />percent criterion of Church et al. (1987). These samples were sieved through 8 mm screens in <br />the field, and the remainder was dry sieved through finer screens in the laboratory. Samples of <br />fine sediment were collected from several locations in pools and backwaters on occasions before <br /> <br />28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.