Laserfiche WebLink
<br />FINAL REPORT, November 2003 <br />High-jlow Requirements for the Duchesne River <br /> <br />identify portions of coverages in need of correction. Any polygon indicating a change from an <br />active channel to a terrace surface is clearly false. A local displacement error equal to or greater <br />than the local width ofthe false polygon must exist at each point along the channel adjacent to <br />the false polygon. Significant false polygon errors were initially detected at between one and <br />five locations on each change coverage. For each sequentially paired set of coverages, one <br />coverage was rectified relative to the other using a spatially-limited rubber-sheeting procedure. <br />Near channel features on the coverage being rubber-sheeted were adjusted to a position chosen to <br />reduce or eliminate any false polygons upon subsequent spatial overlay with the other coverage <br />in the pair. All adjustments were limited to the immediate vicinity of false polygons by using the <br />"limitadjust" feature of the software. <br /> <br />Development of a Gravel Budget <br />Sediment budgets were developed for subreaches 5-19 by multiplying areas of erosion <br />and deposition for each subreach by the estimated average thickness of gravel deposits <br />associated with particular map units. This approach required estimation of the elevations of each <br />geomorphic surface above a datum tied to the channel bed and estimation of the elevation of the <br />top of the gravel deposits in each surface. Reach-scale budgets for gravel were developed by <br />establishing a downstream boundary condition where gravel transport rates were assumed to be <br />zero, then sequentially accumulating storage changes in the upstream subreaches. The <br />downstream zero-transport boundary was assumed to exist near t~e point where the channel <br />gradient abruptly flattens to less than one-third of its upstream value and the river bed begins a <br />rapid transition from gravel to sand. <br />Gravel-thickness attributes were assigned to particular map units based on field <br />measurements. The longitudinally variable deposit heights used in calculating gravel volumes in <br />this study are reported in Table 6. Terraces within subreaches 5-19 are composed of gravel <br />deposits overlain by a layer of sand or silt of variable thickness. The elevations of terrace and <br />the tops of gravel deposits underlying the terraces above a base-flow water surface level of 500 <br />ft3 Is were observed and mapped at all cutbanks through subreaches 5-19 in October 1999. An <br />average stage-discharge relationship was estimated using several surveyed cross sections and <br />used to adjust subsequent observations of deposit heights to a similar water surface datum. <br /> <br />21 <br />