My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9493
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9493
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 12:35:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9493
Author
Gaeuman, D., P. R. Wilcock and J. C. Schmidt.
Title
High Flow Requirements for Channel and Habitat Maintenance of the Lower Duchesne River between Randlett and Ouray, Utah.
USFW Year
2003.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
150
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />FINAL REPORT, November 2003 <br />High-jlow Requirements for the Duchesne River <br /> <br />as lower-quartile years, while water years with total annual discharge in the middle two quartiles <br />were defined as middle-quartile years. Average annual suspended sediment fluxes were <br />estimated by separating the records from each water year into rising and falling limbs of the <br />annual spring peak, multiplying each daily discharge by the daily load computed from the <br />appropriate ratings relation, and dividing by the number of water years in each interval or <br />quartile subset. <br /> <br />Geomorphic Mapping <br />The distribution of geomorphic surfaces in the alluvial valley of the Duchesne River <br />between Ouray and Randlett was mapped in the field in June 2000 onto a 1997 aerial photograph <br />base. The river configuration depicted on the 1997 photo base was generally consistent with <br />observed field conditions, except in a short reach known as the Bowtie (Figure 2) where there <br />were significant channel changes in 1998 and 1999. Major types of geomorphic surfaces defined <br />for this study include channel, bar surfaces, floodplain surfaces, and terrace surfaces. Each of <br />these major categories was further subdivided into several sub-types (Table 1). Mapping units <br />were distinguished in the field and on the photo base by elevation above the stream, surface <br />topography, vegetation, and surficial geologic materials. Unit boundaries were precisely drawn <br />on mylar overlain on the photo base in the field and subsequently adjusted in the laboratory with <br />the aid of stereoscopic viewing and standard photogeologic techniques. Map units and <br />geomorphic photo interpretations developed in the field and with the 1997 photographs were <br />applied to seven additional sets of aerial photographs taken between 1936 and 1993. Mapping <br />unit boundaries were drawn on mylar overlays for each photo set while viewing the photos <br />through a stereoscope. Because the degree of uncertainty in classification of surface units <br />increases on older or poor-quality photo bases, a system of inheriting map units from younger <br />photo bases was implemented. Once a map unit classification was determined for a map unit <br />observed on a given photo series, the same classification was assumed for the same surface on <br />the preceding photo series, unless there was compelling evidence of change. This method allows <br />surface classifications verified by field observation to be propagated to older photomaps for <br />which field verification is impossible. In applying this method, we recognize that the character <br />of some geomorphic surfaces change over time even in the absence of fluvial reworking. For <br /> <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.